FUNCTIONAL VARIETIES OF BIEQUIVALENT TERMS AS A MEANS OF DEVELOPING COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Shikhalieva Sabrina Khanalievna, Sultanakhmedova Kamilat Akhmedovna, Ramazanova Dzhavgarat Asadulaevna
Dagestan Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Makhachkala
Dagestan State Pedagogical University, Makhachkala
Abstract. Recognizing the fact of functioning of the Russian language in polyethnic Dagestan and heterogeneous composition of the population, one can substantiate the function of biequivalent loan words and systematize the content of the terms of paronymy. The content of biequivalent terms has been classified in teaching paronyms in the Russian language lessons. Presenting the experience of the development of textual criticism on the lessons of the Russian language, the authors offer to group biequivalent terms in the intellectual language and to consider phraseological paronyms in the spoken language.
Key words and phrases: язык науки и образования, фразеологические паронимы, текстология, паронимия, разговорная русская речь, развитие коммуникативных навыков, дагестанские школы, коммуникативно-прагматический подход, language of science and education, phraseological paronyms, textology, paronymy, the Russian spoken speech, development of communicative skills, the Dagestan schools, communicative-pragmatic approach
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Abdullaev A. A. Kul'tura russkoi rechi v usloviyakh natsional'no-russkogo dvuyazychiya. Makhachkala: DGPU, 1995. 289 s.
Alekseev I. S. Tekst i perevod. Voprosy teorii. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2008. 180 s.
Arnol'd I. V. Semantika. Stilistika. Intertekstual'nost'. M.: URSS, 2013. 442 s.
Vinogradov V. V. Izbrannye trudy. Issledovaniya po russkoi grammatike. M.: Nauka, 1975. 562 s.
Grigor'ev V. P. Grafika i orfografiya u A. Voznesenskogo // Nereshennye voprosy russkogo pravopisaniya: sb. statei / pod red. R. I. Avanesova, A. A. Reformatskogo. M.: Nauka, 1974. S. 162-172.
Kaidalova A. I., Kalinina I. K. Sovremennaya russkaya orfografiya. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1983. 240 s.
Karaulov Yu. N. Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost'. M.: Nauka, 1987. 259 s.
Kobozeva I. M. Lingvisticheskaya semantika. M.: Domkniga, 2007. 352 s.
Loseva L. M. Kak stroitsya tekst: posobie dlya uchitelei / pod red. G. Ya. Solganika. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1980. 96 s.
Makeeva S. N. Keis-metod v issledovanii metodicheskoi kompetentsii uchitelya inostrannogo yazyka // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 5 (59): v 3-kh ch. Ch. 3. S. 210-212.
Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost' s deistvitel'nost'yu. M., 2004. 288 s.
Superanskaya A. V. Obshchaya teoriya imeni sobstvennogo. M.: Nauka, 1973. 363 s.
Superanskaya A. V. Orfografiya sobstvennykh imen. M.: Nauka, 1973. 144 s.
Superanskaya A. V. Struktura sobstvennogo imeni. Fonologiya i morfologiya. M.: Nauka, 1969. 207 s.
Shikhalieva S. Kh., Karaeva E. A., Fetalieva L. P. Imya sobstvennoe*imya naritsatel'noe kak faktor sistemnosti v terminologii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 5 (59): v 3-kh ch. Ch. 3. S. 169-173.
Русский
