GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 6. Part 3. P. 132-134.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

THE NOTIONS "STRENGTHENING", "ACCENTUATING" AND "FOCUS" IN THE CONTEXT OF PRAGMALINGUISTICS: THEORETICAL ASPECT
Manzheleevskaya Elena Vyacheslavovna, Rubanova Ol'ga Andreevna
Southern Federal University
Abstract. In the article the linguistic terms "strengthening", "accentuating" and "focus" are presented from the point of view of their importance for pragmalinguistics. These notions are associated with such components of speech act as the sender, the addressee and the speech effect. The analysis of theoretical sources has shown that if these terms have the individual specificity for pragmalinguistics, their complex use in describing the speech interaction of the sender and the addressee of the voice message and various types of speech effect is productive.
Key words and phrases: усиление, акцентирование, фокус, прагмалингвистика, отправитель и получатель речевого сообщения, речевое воздействие, strengthening, accentuating, focus, pragmalinguistics, sender and addressee of voice message, speech effect
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Beruchashvili I. G. Sistemnye i rechevye intensifikatory v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Tbilisi, 1986. 21 s.
  2. Gerasimova L. Ya. Usilitel'nye narechiya v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. L., 1970. 25 s.
  3. Deik T. A. van. Voprosy pragmatiki teksta // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike / per. s angl. M.: Progress, 1978. Vyp. 8. Lingvistika teksta. S. 259-336.
  4. Dostoevskii F. M. Unizhennye i oskorblennye. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1964. 374 s.
  5. Egorshina E. E. Pragmalingvisticheskie osobennosti leksicheskikh usilitelei v sovremennom nemetskom yazyke: diss. … k. filol. n. Rostov-na-Donu, 1997. 231 s.
  6. Kibrik A. A. Fokusirovanie vnimaniya i mestoimenno-anaforicheskaya nominatsiya // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1987. № 3. S. 79-90.
  7. Kiseleva L. A. Yazyk kak sredstvo rechevogo vozdeistviya. L.: Izd-vo LGPI im. A. I. Gertsena, 1971. 60 s.
  8. Manzheleevskaya E. V. Vliyanie pragmaticheskikh ozhidanii otpravitelya na ego rechevoe povedenie (na materiale tekstov russkikh i angliiskikh pisatelei KhIKh veka): diss. … k. filol. n. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008. 197 s.
  9. Manzheleevskaya E. V. K voprosu o tipakh rechevogo vozdeistviya (na materiale tekstov russkikh i angliiskikh pisatelei-klassikov) // Inostrannye yazyki: lingvisticheskie i metodicheskie aspekty. Tver': Tverskoi gos. un-t, 2013. Vyp. 19. S. 182-189.
  10. Manzheleevskaya E. V. Rechevoe povedenie pisatelya kak indikator uslovii ego lichnostnoi i tvorcheskoi realizatsii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 10 (64): v 3-kh ch. Ch. 1. S. 115-118.
  11. Manzheleevskaya E. V. Rechevye predpochteniya viktorianskikh pisatel'nits kak pokazatel' ikh pragmaticheskikh ozhidanii (na materiale angloyazychnykh tekstov E. Gaskell, Dzh. Eliot i M. Breddon) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 12 (66): v 4-kh ch. Ch. 1. S. 121-126.
  12. Matveeva G. G. Nyuansy smysla v skrytoi pragmalingvistike // Filologicheskii vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 1998. № 2. S. 28-32.
  13. Nikolaeva T. M. Semantika aktsentnogo vydeleniya. M.: Nauka, 1982. 96 s.
  14. Rubanova O. A. Leksicheskie sredstva usileniya rechevogo vozdeistviya v pobuditel'nykh vyskazyvaniyakh // Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki. 2008. № 2. S. 82-89.
  15. Rubanova O. A. Manipulyativnye formy rechevogo vozdeistviya kak sposob dostizheniya namereniya govoryashchego (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka). Rostov-na-Donu - Taganrog, 2017. 104 c.
  16. Rubanova O. A. Sredstva usileniya rechevogo vozdeistviya pri vyrazhenii znacheniya pobuzhdeniya (na materiale angliiskogo i russkogo yazykov): diss.. k. filol. n. Rostov-na-Donu, 2006. 184 s.
  17. Rubanova O. A. Tipy perlokutivnogo effekta vyskazyvanii s semantikoi pobuzhdeniya v situatsiyakh povsednevnogo obshcheniya // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki. 2013. № 2. S. 139-146.
  18. Turanskii I. I. Semanticheskaya kategoriya intensivnosti v angliiskom yazyke. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1990. 173 s.
  19. Sheigal E. I. Intensivnost' kak komponent semantiki slova v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: diss. … k. filol. n. M.: GGPUIYa im. Morisa Toreza, 1981. 244 s.
  20. Mathesius W. Verstaerkung und Emphase // Melanges de Linguistigue offerts a Charles Bally. Geneve, 1939. S. 407-413.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru