GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and PracticePhilological Sciences. Issues of Theory and PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 9. Part 1. P. 70-72. ISSN 1997-2911.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

THE PECULIARITIES OF OPPOSITION OF IMAGES AND NOTIONS IN THE CHUVASH AND TATAR PROSE OF THE END OF THE XX - THE BEGINNING OF THE XXI CENTURY

Chekushkina Elena Petrovna
I. N. Ulianov Chuvash State University


Abstract. The Chuvash and Tatar peoples, being genetically related, have much in common in their cultural development. In modern literary criticism, more and more attention is paid to the comparative analysis of works of related peoples, because it helps to understand better the multifaceted and different modern world, as well as the processes that take place in it. That is why this article examines the peculiarities of the Chuvash prose of the late twentieth and early twenty-first century in the context of Tatar literature. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the works of Chuvash writers A. Tarasov, V. Petrov and Tatar writers R. Rakhman, K. Latyp. The disclosure of the motive of loneliness and the study of the moral and ethical relationships of people in the modern world are the main priorities in the work of the writers under consideration.
Key words and phrases: чувашская проза, татарская проза, образы и мотивы, Арсений Тарасов, Василий Петров, Рифа Рахман, Кави Латып, Chuvash prose, Tatar prose, images and motives, Arsenii Tarasov, Vasilii Petrov, Rifa Rakhman, Kavi Latyp.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Belaya G. A. Literatura v zerkale kritiki. Sovremennye problemy: monografiya. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1986. 368 s.
  2. Kudryavtseva R. A. Kompozitsiya rasskazov "Deti moi" V. Berdinskogo, "Dvoe v starosti" Ars. Tarasova i "Sverchok" R. Rakhman (opyt sravnitel'nogo analiza) // Vestnik Mariiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 1 (13). S. 131-134.
  3. Myshkina A. F. Chuvashskaya khudozhestvenno-filosofskaya i khudozhestvenno-publitsisticheskaya proza vtoroi poloviny XX veka: monografiya. Cheboksary: Izd-vo Chuvash. un-ta, 2005. 275 s.
  4. Petrov V. Kiv?en // T?van At?l. 2009. № 3. S. 100-115.
  5. Petrov V. ?yru // T?van At?l. 2008. № 1. S. 106-110.
  6. Sovremennaya tatarskaya proza / per. s tatarskogo; sost. L. Gazizova, S. Malyshev. Kazan': Tatar. kn. izd-vo, 2007. 670 s.
  7. Tarasov A. V?lt?rtetse v??et sar? ?ul??: kalavsem. Shupashkar: Ch?vash k?n.izd-vi, 2016. 288 s.
  8. Fedorov G. I. Khudozhestvennyi mir chuvashskoi prozy 1950-1990 gg.: monografiya. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 1996. 304 s.
  9. Chekushkina E. P. Osobennosti prozy molodykh pisatelei v chuvashskoi literature kontsa KhKh - nachala XXI v. // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. № 6 (48): v 2-kh ch. Ch. 2. C. 184-187.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2019 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru