GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 1. Part 1. P. 138-142.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-1-1.36

COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF SEMANTIC SHIFT IN BI-TRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS: METAPHOR, METONYMY, FIGURATIVENESS
Makoeva Dana Gisovna
Institute of Informatics and Problems of Regional Management (Branch) of Federal Scientific Center "Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences"
Abstract. The article is devoted to studying speech units with a bi-transitive construction which undergo semantic shift of a metaphorical or metonymical type. The analysis of empiric material allowed the author to identify the conceptual structure of metaphorical and metonymical transfers conditioning the extension of bi-transitive semantics of a construction, to discover the potential of metaphor and metonymy as mental mechanisms providing the figurativeness of a statement and the adaptation of abstract categories within the space of objective semantics.
Key words and phrases: двупереходная конструкция, концептуальная метафора, концептуальная метонимия, семантический сдвиг, стилистически-маркированные / образные высказывания, агенсный аргумент, реципиентный аргумент, пациенсный аргумент, bi-transitive construction, conceptual metaphor, conceptual metonymy, semantic shift, stylistically marked/figurative statements, agent argument, recipient argument, patience argument
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Vezhbitskaya A. Semanticheskie universalii i bazisnye kontsepty. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2011. 568 s.
  2. Zagirova Z. R. Ponyatie metonimii: ot antichnosti do sovremennosti // Filologicheskie besedy. Russkaya rech'. M.: Nauka, 2015. № 1. S. 55-61.
  3. Kul'chitskaya L. V. Ponyatie "kognitivnaya" i "kontseptual'naya" metafora v otechestvennoi lingvistike rannekognitivnogo perioda // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 11. S. 85-90.
  4. Pastukhova E. A. Kognitivno-semanticheskie svoistva konstruktsii s komponentom "put'"/way (na materiale sovremennogo angliiskogo yazyka): disc. … k. filol. n. Pyatigorsk, 2016. 224 s.
  5. Rakhilina E. V. Lingvistika konstruktsii. M.: Izdatel'skii tsentr "Azbukovnik", 2010. 584 s.
  6. Ustarkhanov R. I. Metaftonimiya v angliiskom yazyke: interpretatsionno-kognitivnyi analiz: disc. … k. filol. n. Pyatigorsk, 2006. 179 s.
  7. Khakhalova S. A. Kontseptosfera lichnostnoi pristrastnosti: metafora // Antropologicheskaya lingvistika. Kontsepty. Kategorii: kollektivnaya monografiya. M.: Irkutsk, 2003. S. 195-229.
  8. Sharmanova O. S. Metaftonimiya kak kontseptual'noe vzaimodeistvie metafory i metonimii // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2011. № 1. S. 194-200.
  9. Blank A. Co-presence and Succession: A Cognitive Typology of Metonymy // Metonymy in Language and Thought / ed. by K. Panther, G. Radden. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1990. P. 169-191.
  10. Corpus of Contemporary American English [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://corpus.byu.edu/coca (data obrashcheniya: 26.08.2017).
  11. Croft W. The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies // Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002. № 4. P. 335-371.
  12. Dabrowska E., Divijak D. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015. 716 p.
  13. Fielding H. Bridget Jones’s Diary. London: Picador, 1996. 157 p.
  14. Goldberg A. E. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. 265 p.
  15. Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. 632 p.
  16. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 242 p.
  17. Lakoff G., Turner M. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989. 237 p.
  18. Mendoza R., Diez F., Diez O. Patterns of Conceptual Interaction // Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin - N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002. P. 489-532.
  19. Qi X. A Corpus-based Study of Alternating Ditransitive Constructions in Chinese Learner English. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2014. 207 p.
  20. Radden G. Generic Reference in English: A Metonymic and Conceptual Blending Analysis // Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009. P. 199-228.
  21. Radden G., Kovecses Z. Towards a Theory of Metonymy // Metonymy in Language and Thought / ed. by K. Panther, G. Radden. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999. P. 17-61.
  22. Reddy M. J. The Conduit Metaphor - a Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language // Ortony A. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. P. 284-324.
  23. TIME Magazine Corpus [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://corpus.byu.edu/time (data obrashcheniya: 21.09.2017).
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru