GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and PracticePhilological Sciences. Issues of Theory and PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 12. Part 1. P. 130-134. ISSN 1997-2911.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-12-1.27

DIALECTICAL INTERACTION OF ARGUMENTATION AND MANIPULATION IN JUDICIAL DISCURSIVE PRACTICES

Krapivkina Ol’ga Aleksandrovna
Irkutsk National Research Technical University


Submitted: 19.09.2018.
Abstract. The article deals with the dialectical interaction of argumentation and manipulation in judicial discursive practices. It is noted that manipulation as a method of speech impact on the irrational sphere of consciousness violates logical laws, however, helps to achieve the perlocutionary speech effect faster than logically built-up argumentation, if the addressees are the bearers of naive consciousness. The correlation of argumentation and manipulation in judicial discourse is determined by the intentional state of the speaker, the addressee’s factor and the mode of communication.
Key words and phrases: аргументация, манипуляция, диалектика, дискурсивные практики, судебное разбирательство, речевое воздействие, argumentation, manipulation, dialectics, discursive practices, trial, speech impact.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Bern E. Igry, v kotorye igrayut lyudi. M.: Eksmo, 2003. 320 s.
  2. Volkov A. A. Neoritorika Bryussel'skoi shkoly // Neoritorika: genezis, problemy, perspektivy. M.: Vlados, 1987. S. 46-68.
  3. Graneva I. Yu. Mestoimenie "my" kak sredstvo ideologicheskikh manipulyatsii v russkoi yazykovoi kartine mira // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2010. № 4 (2). S. 494-496.
  4. Grishem Dzh. Pora ubivat'. M.: AST, 2003. 573 s.
  5. Dotsenko E. L. Psikhologiya manipulyatsii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashchita. M.: CheRo; MGU, 1996. 344 s.
  6. Ermakov Yu. A. Manipulyatsiya lichnost'yu: smysl, priemy, posledstviya. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1995. 208 s.
  7. Zheltukhina M. R. Komicheskoe v politicheskom diskurse kontsa KhKh veka. Volgograd: Izd-vo VF MUPK, 2003. 264 s.
  8. Kaplunenko A. M. O tekhnologicheskoi sushchnosti manipulyatsii soznaniem i ee lingvisticheskikh priznakakh // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2007. № 5. S. 3-12.
  9. Li E. V. Dialekticheskoe vzaimodeistvie universal'nykh i etnokul'turnykh strategii argumentatsii v politicheskom diskurse: diss. … k. filol. n. Irkutsk, 2011. 209 s.
  10. Mikhaleva O. L. Politicheskii diskurs. Spetsifika manipulyativnogo vozdeistviya. M.: Librokom, 2009. 252 s.
  11. Serl' Dzh. R. Kosvennye rechevye akty // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M.: Progress, 1986. Vyp. 17. Teoriya rechevykh aktov / pod red. B. Yu. Gorodetskogo. S. 195-283.
  12. Allport G. W. Attitudes // Handbook of social psychology. Worchester: Clark University Press, 1988. P. 798-844.
  13. Grisham J. A Time to Kill. N. Y.: Random House; Dell, 2009. 544 p.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2019 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru