GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and PracticePhilological Sciences. Issues of Theory and PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 5. Part 2. P. 296-299. ISSN 1997-2911.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-5-2.18

PECULIARITIES OF SEMANTICS OF THE GERMAN STRESSED PARTICLES JA, DOCH AND SCHON

Averina Anna Viktorovna
Moscow Region State University


Submitted: 25.02.2018.
Abstract. The article considers the features of the semantics of the German stressed particles JA, DOCH and SCHON . It is shown that these particles have a common property - they can create contrast. The distinctive characteristics of these particles are traced when analyzing them in the system of syntagmatic links and relations. The stressed particle DOCH expresses disagreement of the speaker with the interlocutor’s position or indicates contradiction. The stressed particle JA is characteristic for directive statements. The stressed particle SCHON adds meanings to the utterance, such as "yes, however...", and participates in adversative relations transfer.
Key words and phrases: дискурсивные частицы, ударность, контраст, отрицание, скрытая семантика, дейктичность, грамматикализация, discursive particles, state of being stressed, contrast, negation, hidden semantics, deixis character, grammaticalization.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Averina A. V. K probleme razgranicheniya modal'nykh i diskursivnykh chastits v nemetskom yazyke // Evraziiskii guma-nitarnyi zhurnal. 2017. № 2. S. 4-7.
  2. Byuler K. Teoriya yazyka. M.: Progress, 2000. 528 s.
  3. Kobozeva I. M. Lingvisticheskaya semantika. M.: URSS, 2007. 352 s.
  4. Abraham W. The grammaticalization of the German modal particles // Approaches to grammaticalization. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1991. Vol. II. Focus on types of grammatical markers. P. 331-380.
  5. Abraham W. ?ber Unhintergehbarkeiten in der modernen Modalit?tsforschung // Modalit?t und Evidentialit?t. Trier: Focus, 2011. S. 125-147.
  6. Datenbank f?r gesprochenes Deutsch [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://dgd.ids-mannheim.de (data obrashcheniya: 22.02.2018).
  7. DECOW 16 A [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: www.webcorpora.org (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2018).
  8. Diewald G. Deixis und Textsorten im Deutschen. T?bingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1991. 435 S.
  9. Hentschel E. Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln. Ja, doch, halt und eben. T?bingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1986. 291 S.
  10. Kotin M. Die Sprache in statu movendi. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag, 2007. Bd. 2. 372 S.
  11. Kotin M. Ik gihorta dat seggen.. Modalit?t, Evidentialit?t, Sprachwandel und das Problem der grammatischen Kategorisierung // Modalit?t und Evidentialit?t. Trier: Focus, 2011. S. 35-48.
  12. Lehmann Chr. Wortarten und Grammatikalisierung. Perspektiven in System und Erwerb // Wortarten und Grammatikalisierung. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2005. S. 1-20.
  13. Meibauer J. Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung. Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln. T?bingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 1994. 252 S.
  14. Szczepanik R. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Eine Einf?hrung. T?bingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH, 2011. 233 S.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2019 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru