GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and PracticePhilological Sciences. Issues of Theory and PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. 7. Part 1. P. 74-77. ISSN 1997-2911.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-7-1.16

THE PROBLEM OF THE TERM "RUSSIAN PHILOSOPHICAL CRITICISM" IN RELATION TO THE END OF THE XIX - THE FIRST THIRD OF THE CENTURY

Khrustaleva Anna Vladimirovna
Saratov State University


Submitted: 10.04.2018.
Abstract. The article examines the term "philosophical criticism". The author points to the problems of periodization in consideration of critical articles written by philosophers of Russian religious-philosophical renaissance. It is shown that the terms "symbolist criticism" and "philosophical criticism" are in contradiction based on different understanding of the history of literature - calendar and constitutive-typological. It is emphasized that the criticism of Plekhanov and his epigones has every reason to claim the presence of a serious philosophical component, the term itself is therefore incorrect. The paper points to the most important feature of the method of literary text research, typical of Russian religious philosophers.
Key words and phrases: . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , , V. S. Solovyev, S. N. Bulgakov, K. N. Leontyev, N. A. Berdyaev, I. A. Ilyin, S. L. Frank, G. P. Fedotov, M. O. Gershenzon, Russian philosophical criticism.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Volodina N. V. O tipologii literaturnoi kritiki XIX veka // Osvobozhdenie ot dogm. Istoriya russkoi literatury: sostoyanie i puti izucheniya: v 2-kh t. M.: Nasledie, 1997. T. 1. S. 269-277.
  2. Depretto K. Literaturnaya kritika i istoriya literatury v Rossii kontsa XIX - nachala KhKh veka // Istoriya russkoi literatury. XX vek. Serebryanyi vek / pod red. Zh. Niva, I. Serman i dr. M.: Progress; Litera, 1995. S. 242-258.
  3. Isupov K. G. Filosofiya i literatura "serebryanogo veka" (sblizheniya i perekrestki) // Russkaya literatura rubezha vekov (1890-e - nachalo 1920-kh godov). M., 2000. S. 69-130.
  4. Krupchanov L. M. Istoriya russkoi literaturnoi kritiki XIX veka. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2005. 383 s.
  5. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya russkogo zarubezh'ya: 1918-1940: v 4-kh t. M.: ROSSPEN, 2000-2002.
  6. Mann Yu. V. Russkaya filosofskaya estetika. 1820-1830-e gody. M.: Iskusstvo, 1969. 304 s.
  7. Osvobozhdenie ot dogm. Istoriya russkoi literatury: sostoyanie i puti izucheniya: v 2-kh t. M.: Nasledie, 1997. T. 1. 310 s.
  8. Svyatopolk-Mirskii D. S. Istoriya russkoi literatury s drevneishikh vremen po 1925 god. Novosibirsk: Svin'in i synov'ya, 2005. 876 s.
  9. Solov'ev V. S. Poeziya Ya. P. Polonskogo. Kriticheskii ocherk // Solov'ev V. S. Literaturnaya kritika. M.: Sovremennik, 1990. S. 120-202.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

2006-2019 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru