GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2011. № 5. Part 1. P. 74-78.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Law Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

PECULIARITIES OF PROCESS IN COURT WITH JURYMEN ACCORDING TO JUDICIAL REGULATIONS OF 1864

Gromikova Ol'ga Evgen'evna
Penza State University


Abstract. The author reveals the rules of procedure in court with jurymen according to Judicial Regulations of 1864 and pays special attention to its peculiarities which experience of legal regulation may be used for perfecting modern Russian legislation.
Key words and phrases: суд присяжных, судебный процесс, исследование доказательств, вопросный лист, вердикт, jury trial, legal trial, evidence research, questionnaire, verdict
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Brazhnik F. S. Sud prisyazhnykh, ego stanovlenie i razvitie v Rossii // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo industrial'nogo universiteta. Seriya "Gumanitarnye nauki". 2002. № 1. S. 113-122.
  2. Bykov V. M., Mitrofanova E. N. Prichiny vyneseniya prisyazhnymi zasedatelyami neobosnovannykh opravdatel'nykh verdiktov // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 2. S. 47-51.
  3. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Penzenskoi oblasti (GAPO). F. 42. Op. 1.
  4. Ibid. Op. 5.
  5. Ibid. Op. 9.
  6. Demichev A. A. Istoriya suda prisyazhnykh v dorevolyutsionnoi Rossii: 1864-1917. M.: Yurlitinform, 2007. 320 s.
  7. Koni A. F. Ottsy i deti sudebnoi reformy. M., 1914. 295 s.
  8. Moiseeva T. V. Vsestoronnost' i polnota issledovaniya obstoyatel'stv ugolovnogo dela kak usloviya ob"ektivnosti prisyazhnykh zasedatelei // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2010. № 12. S. 87-93.
  9. Moiseeva T. V. Preniya storon - uslovie, obespechivayushchee ob"ektivnost' prisyazhnykh zasedatelei // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 11. S. 36-40.
  10. Nemytina M. V. Rossiiskii sud prisyazhnykh. M.: BEK, 1995. 218 s.
  11. Petropavlovskii V. G. Osnovnye voprosy prisyazhnym trebuyut utochneniya // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2006. № 2. S. 36-37.
  12. Popova A. D. Pravda i milost' da tsarstvuyut v sudakh: iz istorii realizatsii sudebnoi reformy 1864 g. Ryazan': Poverennyi, 2005. 312 s.
  13. Ryabtseva E. V. Sud prisyazhnykh v Rossii: diskussionnye voprosy // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2008. № 1. S. 57-60.
  14. Tisen O. N. K probleme okazaniya vozdeistviya na prisyazhnykh zasedatelei // Ibid. 2009. № 10. S. 64-67.
  15. Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (UUS). St. 654-656.
  16. Ibid. St. 670.
  17. Khrulev S. S. Sud prisyazhnykh: ocherk deyatel'nosti sudov i sudebnykh poryadkov // Zhurnal grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo prava. 1886. № 8. S. 1-74.
  18. Shatovkina R. V. Stanovlenie i razvitie suda prisyazhnykh v Rossii // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2005. № 4. S. 12-16.
  19. Shcheglovitov I. G. Sudebnye ustavy imperatora Aleksandra II: Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. SPb., 1913. 1153 s.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru