Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2012. № 12. Part 3. P. 13-16.
CRITICISM OF "RETRIBUTIVISM" THEORY IN CONTEMPORARY RESEARCHERS’ WORKS
Artemenkov Mikhail Nikolaevich, Potapenkova Tat'yana Igorevna
Smolensk State University
Abstract. The authors reveal the basic propositions of "retributivism" theory, in particular stated in I. Kant’s political-legal doctrine, and pay special attention to the criticism of this theory in contemporary law theorists’ works, emphasizing the propositions that do not allow the "theory of retribution" being the basis of modern approach to the formation of punishment execution system.
Key words and phrases: политико-правовая доктрина, теория "ретрибутивизма", возмездие, наказание, political-legal doctrine, "retributivism" theory, retribution, punishment
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Artemenkov M. N. Osnovnye polozheniya teorii nakazaniya v rabotakh I. Kanta // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2011. № 8. S. 18-20.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti. M., 1999.
Moiseev S. V. Filosofiya prava. Novosibirsk, 2004.
Duff A., Garland D. A Reader on Punishment. L., 1994.
Hampton J. Political Philosophy. Boulder, 1996.
Kevin M. Punishment [Elektronnyi resurs] // Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://www.iep.utm.edu (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2012).
Kidder T. Mountains beyond Mountains. N. Y., 2003.
McCloskey H. A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment // Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment. Albany, 1972.
Packer H. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, 1968.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, 1999.
Shafer-Landau R. Retributivism and Desert // Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 2000. Vol. 81.
Русский
