GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 9. Part 2. P. 219-221.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Law Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

CONCEPTUAL QUESTIONS OF LEGISLATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY

Yastrebov Oleg Aleksandrovich, Shmeleva Svetlana Vladislavovna, Shmelev Ivan Valer'evich
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Russian Academy of Justice


Abstract. The article reveals the specificity of the basic domestic conceptions of administrative liability. Particular attention is paid to the systematization of the directions of improving the legislation on administrative offenses, including the optimization of administrative fines amplitude. The article emphasizes a number of suggestions intended for gradual integration into the current legislation on administrative offenses, in particular the development of the institutions of reconciliation with victims and public censure.
Key words and phrases: административная ответственность, административное правонарушение, административный штраф, институт общественного порицания, институт примирения с потерпевшим, administrative liability, administrative offense, administrative fine, institution of public ce
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Agapov A. B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M.: Statut, 2000. 251 s.
  2. Alekhin A. P., Karmolitskii A. A., Kozlov Yu. M. Administrativnoe pravo RF. M.: IKD "Zertsalo-M", 2003. 608 s.
  3. Baturina S. V. Traditsii rossiiskoi pravovoi doktriny: diss. … k.yu.n. Krasnodar, 2008. 185 s.
  4. Bakhrakh D. N. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' po administrativnomu pravu // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2010. № 1. S. 2-5.
  5. Veremeenko I. I. Administrativno-pravovye sanktsii. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1975. 192 s.
  6. Galagan I. A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie). Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo gos. un-ta, 1976. 199 s.
  7. Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii (SZRF). 2002. № 1. Ch. 1. St. 1.
  8. Kommentarii k Kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / pod red. N. G. Salishchevoi. M.: Prospekt, 2009. 663 s.
  9. Lunev A. E. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. 186 s.
  10. Chernova E. G. Priroda pozitivnoi yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti v trudakh otechestvennykh uchenykh // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 7 (33). Ch. I. S. 214-217.
  11. Yakuba O. M. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1972. 152 s.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru