Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 4. Part 1. P. 44-47.
Volkova Anna Vladimirovna
Saint Petersburg State University
Abstract. Manageability is interpreted by the author as the state ability to respond to the challenges of globalization, modernization, and also to the rise of social demands and expectations, which nowadays often go beyond the limits of traditional institutions. The author associates manageability improvement with the development of communication, dialogue and cooperation in society, accentuating the problem of the formation of the system of common values or development key-points by citizens together with public authorities. It means that responsibility for the manageability, efficiency and quality of public administration is entrusted not only to the state, but also to civil society. Therefore the author specifies the term "civil competence", suggests considering the conception "civil abilities" as the activity characteristics of citizens in public interaction.
Key words and phrases: управляемость государства, глобализация, публичное управление, публичные ценности, гражданская состоятельность, гражданские способности, state manageability, globalization, public administration, public values, civil competence, civil abilities
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Volkova A. V. Seti v publichnoi politike: formirovanie setevoi kul'tury // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. № 1. Ch. 2. S. 52-55.
Gegel' G. V. F. Raboty raznykh let: v 2-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1972. T. 1. 668 s.
Ienzee I. Grazhdanskaya svoboda i grazhdanskaya dobrodetel' — vazhneishie usloviya funktsionirovaniya demokraticheskoi obshchnosti // Politicheskaya filosofiya v Germanii: sb. st. / pod red. I. Izenzee. M.: Sovremennye tetradi, 2005. S. 43-52.
Inglikhart R. Kul'tura i demokratiya // Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / pod red. L. Kharrisona, S. Khantingtona; per. s angl. A. Zakharova. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii, 2002. S. 106-128.
Smorgunov L. V. V poiskakh upravlyaemosti: kontseptsii i transformatsii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v XXI veke. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2012. 362 s.
Fukuyama F. Sotsial'nyi kapital // Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / pod red. L. Kharrisona, S. Khantingtona; per. s angl. A. Zakharova. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii, 2002. S. 129-148.
Khabermas Yu. Kogda my dolzhny byt' tolerantnymi? O konkurentsii videnii mira, tsennostei i teorii // Sotsis. 2006. № 1. S. 40-49.
Kharrison L. V chem znachenie kul'tury? // Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / pod red. L. Kharrisona, S. Khantingtona; per. s angl. A. Zakharova. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii, 2002. S. 15-38.
Alasuutari P. Globalization and the Nation-State: an Appraisal of the Discussion // Acta Sociologica. 2000. Vol. 43. P. 259-269.
Bartels K. Public Encounters: the History and Future of Face-to-face Contact between Public Professionals and Citizens // Public Administration. 2013. 11 February. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02101.x.
Benington J. Creating the Public in Order to Create Public Value? // International Journal of Public Administration. 2009. Vol. 32 (3-4). P. 232-249.
Moore M. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, 1995. 402 p.
Nabatchi T. Putting the "Public" Back in Public Values Research: Designing Participation to Identify and Respond to Values // Public Administration Review. 2012. Vol. 72 (5). P. 699-708.
Русский
