Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 5. Part 2. P. 29-32.
INTEGRATION VS SOVEREIGNTY: DOES THE EUROPEAN UNION HAVE THE FUTURE?
Bugrov Roman Vladimirovich
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod
Abstract. The article touches upon the theoretical aspects of development and the prospects of integration in the EU. The essence of the problem is conditioned by the presence of two contradictory tendencies: integration processes intensification and the preservation of the sovereign state prerogatives. The author shows that in spite of declarative statements on aspiration for unity there is a number of the institutional, procedural and legal mechanisms of the sovereign state protection from the consequences of the EU federalization.
Key words and phrases: наднациональное управление, суверенное государство, европейская интеграция, теории интеграции, проблемы и перспективы интеграции, субсидиарность, межгосударственный подход, коммунитаризм, supranational administration, sovereign state, the European integra
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bugrov R. V. Poisk balansa mezhdu institutami Evropeiskogo Soyuza: kommunitarnyi i mezhgosudarstvennyi metody prinyatiya reshenii // Vestnik NNGU. 2008. № 3. S. 222-227.
Sergunin A., Makarychev A. Sovremennaya zapadnaya politicheskaya mysl': Postpozitivistskaya revolyutsiya. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo NGLU, 1999. 212 c.
Strezhneva M. Praktika nadnatsioanal'nosti v Evrosoyuze // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy: zhurnal teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii i mirovoi politiki. 2010. T. 8. № 3 (24). C. 57-69.
Suverenitet. Transformatsiya ponyatii i praktik: monografiya / pod red. I. V. Kudryashovoi, M. V. Il'ina. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2008. 228 c.
Entin M. L. Kratkii kommentarii k proektu Dogovora, izmenyayushchego Dogovor o ES [Elektronnyi resurs] // Vsya Evropa. 2007. Vyp. 12 (17). URL: http://www.mgimo.ru/alleurope/2006/17/comment-focus3.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Bartolini S. Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the EU. Oxford: OUP, 2007. 311 p.
Booker C., North R. The Great Deception: Can the European Union Survive? N. Y.: Continuum, 2006. 645 p.
Cini M., Perez-Solorzano Borrag?n N. European Union Politics. 4 ed. Oxford: OUP, 2013. 496 p.
Explanatory Note on the "Community Method" [Elektronnyi resurs]: European Commission MEMO/02/102. 22.05.2002. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-02-102_en.htm (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Golub J. In the Shadow of the Vote? Decision-making in the European Community // IO. 1999. Vol. 53. № 4. P. 349-356.
Hix S. What’s Wrong with the EU and How to Fix It. Cambridge, 2008. 320 r.
Kepteyn P. J. G., VerLoren van Themaat P. Introduction to the Law of the EC. Kluwer Law International, 1998. 930 p.
Moravcsik A. What Can We Learn from the Collapse of the European Constitutional Project [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.notre-europe.eu/media/moravcsik-reponse-en_01.pdf?pdf=ok (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Nicoll W., Salmon T. C. Understanding the European Union. Harlow: Longman, 2001. 575 p.
Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts, Amsterdam, 2 October 1997 // Official Journal of the EC. C 340. 10.11.1997. R. 1-142.
Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, Lisbon, 13 December 2007 // Official Journal of the EU. C 306. 17.12.2007. R. 1-271.
Treaty on European Union. Maastricht, 7 February 1992 (consolidated version) // Official Journal of the EC. C 191. 29.07.1992. R. 1-111.
Русский
