GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and PracticePhilological Sciences. Issues of Theory and PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 8. Part 2. P. 197-201. ISSN 1997-292X.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Law Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

ADEQUACY OF RESTRICTION OF RIGHT TO FAMILIARIZATION WITH MATERIALS OBTAINED AT INITIAL STAGE OF CRIMINAL TRIAL

Cherepanova Liliya Vladimirovna
Barnaul Institute of Law of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs


Abstract. The article formulates a certain conclusion resulting from the correlation of the right of a concrete person to familiarization with documents (materials) directly touching on his/her rights with the interests of other (the third) parties. "Adequacy" is a valuation category and it is defined in different ways depending on different historical stages of the development of law and state. Restrictions on familiarization with materials directly touching on persons’ legitimate interests obtained during pre-investigation check can be imposed exclusively by the Criminal-Procedural Code of the Russian Federation.
Key words and phrases: право на доступ к информации, охраняемая федеральным законом тайна, данные предварительного расследования, ознакомление с материалами уголовного судопроизводства, процессуальные средства защиты информации от разглашения, right to access to information, secret protected by federal law, preliminary investigation data, familiarization with materials of criminal procedure, procedural means of information protection from divulgence.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Brusnitsyn L. V. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovy i mirovoi opyt obespecheniya bezopasnosti lits, sodeistvuyushchikh ugolovnomu pravosudiyu: diss.. d.yu.n. M., 2002. 520 c.
  2. Dzhamalov I. D. Problemy obespecheniya prav lichnosti v dosudebnom ugolovnom proizvodstve // Al'manakh sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya. Tambov: Gramota, 2010. № 3 (34). Ch. II. C. 26-34.
  3. Kal'nitskii V. V. Sudebnoe zasedanie v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam: uchebnoe posobie. Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2009. 96 s.
  4. Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ) [Elektronnyi resurs] // Ofitsial'nyi internet-portal pravovoi informatsii. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.02.2014).
  5. Mel'nikov V. Yu. Naznachenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: problemy, svyazannye s obespecheniem prav cheloveka // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 9 (35). Ch. II. C. 108-110.
  6. O vnesenii izmenenii v stat'yu 5 Federal'nogo zakona "O prokurature Rossiiskoi Federatsii": Federal'nyi zakon ot 02.07.2013 g. № 156-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii (SZRF). 2013. № 27. St. 3448.
  7. Ob utverzhdenii Perechnya svedenii konfidentsial'nogo kharaktera: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 06.03.1997 № 188 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://base.garant.ru/10200083/ (data obrashcheniya: 6.06.2014).
  8. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 2 stat'i 5 Federal'nogo zakona "O prokurature Rossiiskoi Federatsii" v svyazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina B. A. Kekhmana: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 18.02.2000 № 3-P // SZRF. 2000. № 9. St. 1066.
  9. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti statei 1 i 21 Zakona Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 21 iyulya 1993 goda "O gosudarstvennoi taine" v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan V. M. Gurdzhiyantsa, V. N. Sintsova, V. N. Bugrova i A. K. Nikitina: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 27.03.1996 g. № 8-P // SZRF. 1996. № 15. St. 1768.
  10. Po zaprosu Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kareliya o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 9 chasti pervoi, chastei vtoroi i tret'ei stat'i 448 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14.12.2004 № 392-O // SZRF. 2005. № 10. St. 896.
  11. Samoroka V., Beketov M. Problemy soblyudeniya konfidentsial'nosti svedenii o zashchishchaemom litse pri obespechenii bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. S. 95-97.
  12. Sedel'nikov P. V. Dostup uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa k materialam dosudebnogo proizvodstva: avtoref. diss.. k.yu.n. Omsk, 2006. S. 18.
  13. Cherkasov D. A. Soedinenie i vydelenie ugolovnykh del i materialov v Rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse: avtoref. diss. … k.yu.n. Tyumen', 2005. 21 s.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2020 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru