GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 12. Part 2. P. 187-190.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

GELOTOLOGICAL PROBLEMATIC IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF RELIGION

Fedorova Marina Vladimirovna
N. A. Dobrolyubov State Linguistic University of Nizhny Novgorod


Abstract. The article considers possible methodological approaches to the analysis of the problem of interrelation between religion and laughter practices. The conceptual space of modern sciences dealing with religion can be defined by three basic positions with respect to gelotological problematic: firstly, it is "theology of laughter" appealing to the postmodernist theory of laughter. Secondly, it is phenomenology of religion, in particular the phenomenological method of M. Eliade. Thirdly, ideas of Russian religious philosophy are of methodological value for substantiation of "metaphysics of laughter".
Key words and phrases: ритуальный смех, метафизика смеха, теология смеха, феноменология религии, постмодернизм, новая религиозность, ritual laughter, metaphysics of laughter, theology of laughter, phenomenology of religion, postmodernism, new religiosity
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Golozubov A. V. Teologiya smekha kak fenomen zapadnoi kul'tury. Khar'kov: TO "Eksklyuziv", 2009. 468 s.
  2. Goricheva T. M. Pravoslavie i postmodernizm. L.: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1991. 64 s.
  3. Gromov B. Yu. Taksonomiya teorii smekha: problema edinogo znaniya // Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2015. № 4 (53). S. 379-383.
  4. Dobrenko E. Stalinskaya kul'tura: metodologicheskoe udush'e // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2013. № 5. S. 352-361.
  5. Karasev L. V. Filosofiya smekha. M.: Ros. gumanit. un-t, 1996. 224 s.
  6. Kozintsev A. G. Chelovek i smekh. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2007. 234 s.
  7. Lashchenko S. K. Zaklyatie smekhom: opyt istolkovaniya yazycheskikh ritual'nykh traditsii vostochnykh slavyan. M.: Ladomir, 2006. 316 s.
  8. Panchenko A. M. Smekh kak zrelishche // Likhachev D. S., Panchenko A. M., Ponyrko N. V. Smekh v Drevnei Rusi. L.: Nauka, 1984. S. 72-153.
  9. Popkova T. D., Kondakov B. V. Mir detei: mifologicheskii aspekt samobytiya // Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 1. Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury. 2010. № 4 (81). S. 174-187.
  10. Propp V. Ya. Problemy komizma i smekha. Ritual'nyi smekh v fol'klore (po povodu skazki o Nesmeyane). M.: Labirint, 2006. 256 s.
  11. Ryumina M. T. Estetika smekha: smekh kak virtual'naya real'nost'. M.: Knizhnyi dom "LIBROKOM", 2011. 320 s.
  12. Stolovich L. Filosofiya. Estetika. Smekh. SPb. - Tartu, 1999. 384 s.
  13. Stolyar M. Sovetskaya smekhovaya kul'tura. Kiev: Stilos, 2011. 301 s.
  14. Fedorova M. V. Sravnitel'nyi analiz filosofskoi antropologii P. D. Yurkevicha i V. I. Nesmelova: avtoref. diss. … k. filos. n. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2004. 26 s.
  15. Freidenberg O. M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M.: Labirint, 1997. 225 s.
  16. Chesnov Ya. V. Germenevticheskii podkhod k proiskhozhdeniyu smekha // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 1996. № 1. S. 53-61.
  17. Shvechikov A. N. Religiya kak ob"ekt nauchnogo poznaniya: monografiya. SPb.: SPGUDT, 2008. 367 s.
  18. Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1994. 144 s.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru