Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 4. Part 1. P. 124-126.
Muratova Irina Anatol'evna
Tyumen State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Abstract. The article is devoted to the consideration of the issue of the formation of a new constructive methodology of the human’s identity research. The author analyzes a natural for the representative of discursive culture but distorting reality position of the observer - placing him(her)self outside what is happening, - which was a basis of the sense of self and the dual thinking of a human. In this regard, the main in traditional science discourse of human’s duality is considered as a methodological illusion, and a need for the use of the monistic approach admitting a human in all the entirety and the wholeness of his/her nature is grounded.
Key words and phrases: идентичность, методология, позиция наблюдателя, диссоциация, мышление, эволюция, монистический подход, дуализм, identity, methodology, observer’s position, dissociation, thinking, evolution, monistic approach, dualism
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Alyushin A. L., Knyazeva E. N. Endofizika i vremennye shkaly virtual'nogo vospriyatiya // Voprosy filosofii. 2007. № 2. S. 80-95.
Apreleva V. A., Luk'yanenko A. A. Bog rassudka protiv zhivogo Boga v filosofii Immanuila Kanta i L'va Shestova // Religiovedenie. 2012. № 3. S. 105-116.
Beskova I. A. Priroda i obrazy telesnosti. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2011. 456 s.
Buber M. Problema cheloveka // Ya i Ty. M., 1993. C. 157-231.
Bytie (Bibliya). M.: MRO EKhB "Bibleiskaya liga", 2005. 57 s.
Kyulevind G. Zvezdnye deti. M.: Evidentis, 2005. 149 s.
Русский
