GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 12. Part 2. P. 22-26.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

LOGICAL POSITIVISM AND MODERN FORMAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Arkhiereev Nikolai L'vovich
Bauman Moscow State Technical University


Abstract. The article is devoted to the analysis of the strategy of scientific knowledge formalization and axiomatization, proposed within the framework of the logical positivism program. The paper discusses the relationship between the epistemic and formal-logical parts of the program. The main problems associated with the proposed (standard) method of formalizing scientific theories are formulated. The fundamental role of the logical positivism program in the development of modern formal philosophy of science and, in particular, in the development of the set-theoretic (semantic) strategy of scientific theories axiomatization is underlined.
Key words and phrases: стандартная трактовка теории, стандартная формализация теории, аксиоматизация теории, постулаты теории, наблюдаемые следствия, правила соответствия, модель теории, standard interpretation of theory, standard formalization of theory, axiomatization of theory, postulates of theory, observed consequences, compliance rules, model of theory
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Arkhiereev N. L. Filosofiya nauki Ch. S. Pirsa i neopragmatizm [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://hmbul.ru/catalog/ hum/phil/415.html (data obrashcheniya: 05.10.2017).
  2. Masterman M. The Nature of a Paradigm // Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge / ed. by I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. R. 59-89.
  3. Putnam H. What Theories Are Not // Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress / ed. by E. Nagel, P. Suppes, A. Tarski. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1962. R. 240-251.
  4. Suppe F. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989. 485 r.
  5. Suppe F. Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969-1998 // Philosophy of Science. 2000. Vol. 67. R. 102-115.
  6. Suppes P. A Comparison of the Meaning and Use of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences // The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences / ed. by J. Freudenthal. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1961. R. 163-177.
  7. Suppes P. Introduction to Logic. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1957. 330 r.
  8. Suppes P. Models of Data // Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress / ed. by E. Nagel, P. Suppes, A. Tarski. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962. R. 252-261.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru