GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Manuscript. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 12. Part 2. P. 282-286.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2018-12-2.20

ETHICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS OF EUTHANASIA PROBLEM

Volkov Aleksei Vladimirovich
Petrozavodsk State University


Submitted: 30.10.2018
Abstract. The focus of the author’s attention is the problem of active euthanasia and assisted suicide. Relying on the reasoning of modern philosophers and representatives of bioethics, the author shows that the true knot of the problems associated with these phenomena is concentrated around the specificity of the medical profession and respect for the autonomy of a patient’s personality. Separate consideration is also given to the topic of using painkillers. Highlighting various points of view, the author concludes that the position of supporters of euthanasia and assisted suicide is based on the absolutization of the value of a personality’s autonomy and leads to such morally questionable, non-medical reasons for death as "life fatigue", "loss of the meaning of life".
Key words and phrases: эвтаназия, ассистируемое самоубийство, врач, пациент, автономия, боль, мораль, личность, euthanasia, assisted suicide, doctor, patient, autonomy, pain, morality, personality
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Bok S. Euthanasia // Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide / ed. by G. Dworkin, R. G. Frey, S. Bok. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. P. 64-80.
  2. Garcia J. L. Health versus harm: euthanasia and physicians’ duties // Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2007. Vol. 32. P. 7-24.
  3. Hendin H. Seduced by death: doctors, patients, and the Dutch cure // Issues in Law & Medicine. 1994. Vol. 10 (2). P. 123-168.
  4. Kass L. R. Neither for Love nor Money: Why Doctors Must Not Kill // Public Interest. 1989. Vol. 94. P. 25-46.
  5. Leidig M. Dignitas is investigated for helping healthy woman to die // British Medical Journal. 2005. Vol. 331.
  6. Lipuma S. H. Continuous sedation until death as physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia: a conceptual analysis // Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2013. Vol. 38 (2). P. 190-204.
  7. Meier D. E., Emmons C. A., Wallenstein S., Quill T., Morrison R. S., Cassel C. K. A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States // The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998. Vol. 338. P. 1193-1201.
  8. Pellegrino E. D. Doctors must not kill // Euthanasia: The Good of the Patient, The Good of Society / ed. by. R. Misbin. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group, 1992. P. 27-41.
  9. Seay G. Do physicians have an inviolable duty not to kill? // Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2001. Vol. 26 (1). P. 75-91.
  10. Singer P. Voluntary euthanasia: a utilitarian perspective // Bioethics. 2003. Vol. 17 (5-6). P. 526-541.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru