GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Manuscript. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 6. P. 69-75.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2018-6.17

IMMANUEL KANT’S TRANSCENDENTAL METAPHYSICS: INTENTION AND OUTCOMES
Burkhanov Rafael' Airatovich, Nikulina Ol'ga Vyacheslavovna
Surgut State University
Submitted: 20.05.2018
Abstract. The article is devoted to the analysis of Immanuel Kant’s transcendental metaphysics. It is shown that, according to his intention, such metaphysics can be created on the basis of critical attitude to dogmatic doctrines, inconsistency of which in their striving to know super-perceptional objects is obvious. It is noted that critical philosophy deals not with objects as such, perceptional or super-perceptional, but with the transcendental subject, and is an investigation of its abilities and their application limits. The authors emphasize that Kant opposed metaphysics of the transcendental to traditional metaphysics of the transcendent pretending to cognize super-experience and otherworldly "reality". However, he never created an integral metaphysical system confining himself to considering contradictions, with which mind is dealing while trying to leave the ground of experience and to construct an integral and complete picture of the universe. The heuristic significance of this metaphysical project revealed later, in non-classical and post-non-classical doctrines.
Key words and phrases: метафизика, догматизм, критицизм, трансцендентализм, чувственность, рассудок, разум, трансцендентальное, трансцендентное, имманентное, априорное, апостериорное, вещь в себе, явление, metaphysics, dogmatism, criticism, transcendentalism, perception, reason, mind, the transcendental, the transcendent, the immanent, a priori, a posteriori, thing in itself, phenomenon
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Buber M. Problema cheloveka // Buber M. Dva obraza very. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 157-232.
  2. Burkhanov R. A. Transtsendentalizm Immanuila Kanta: istoki i osnovopolozheniya. Surgut: Pechatnyi mir g. Surgut, 2017. 230 s.
  3. Vindel'band V. Istoriya novoi filosofii v ee svyazi s obshchei kul'turoi i otdel'nymi naukami: v 2-kh t. M.: TERRA - Knizhnyi klub; KANON-Press-Ts, 2000. T. 2. Ot Kanta do Nitsshe. 512 s.
  4. Gulyga A. A. Kant. Izd-e 3-e. M.: Soratnik, 1994. 304 s.
  5. Dobrokhotov A. L. Metafizika // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4-kh t. / red. V. S. Stepin, A. A. Guseinov, G. Yu. Semigin i dr. M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 2. S. 541-545.
  6. Kant I. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6-ti t. M.: Mysl', 1965. T. 4. Ch. 1. S. 311-501.
  7. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6-ti t. M.: Mysl', 1966. T. 5. S. 161-527.
  8. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6-ti t. M.: Mysl', 1964. T. 3. S. 69-695.
  9. Kant I. Logika: posobie k lektsiyam // Kant I. Traktaty i pis'ma. M.: Nauka, 1980. S. 319-444.
  10. Kant I. O voprose, predlozhennom na premiyu Korolevskoi Berlinskoi akademii nauk v 1791 godu: kakie deistvitel'nye uspekhi sdelala metafizika v Germanii so vremeni Leibnitsa i Vol'fa? // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6-ti t. M.: Mysl', 1966. T. 6. S. 177-256.
  11. Kant I. O nedavno voznikshem barskom tone v filosofii // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 4-kh t. M.: Kami, 1993. T. 1. S. 479-527.
  12. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6-ti t. M.: Mysl', 1965. T. 4. Ch. 1. S. 219-310.
  13. Kassirer E. Zhizn' i uchenie Kanta. SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1997. 447 s.
  14. Motroshilova N. V. Immanuil Kant // Istoriya filosofii: Zapad - Rossiya - Vostok: v 4-kh kn. / pod red. N. V. Motroshilovoi. Izd-e 2-e. M.: Greko-latinskii kabinet Yu. A. Shichalina, 1998. Kn. 2. Filosofiya XV-XIX vv. S. 342-389.
  15. Oizerman T. I. Razvitie ponyatiya filosofii v kantovskoi "Kritike sposobnosti suzhdeniya" // Kantovskii sbornik. Kaliningrad: Kaliningradskii universitet, 1991. Vyp. 16. S. 12-22.
  16. Perov Yu. V. Antropologicheskoe izmerenie v transtsendental'noi filosofii Kanta // Perov Yu. V., Sergeev K. A., Slinin Ya. A. Ocherki istorii klassicheskogo nemetskogo idealizma. SPb.: Nauka, 2000. S. 268-341.
  17. Perov Yu. V. Kant o sposobnosti suzhdeniya v kontekste prirody i svobody, sushchego i dolzhnogo // Perov Yu. V., Sergeev K. A., Slinin Ya. A. Ocherki istorii klassicheskogo nemetskogo idealizma. SPb.: Nauka, 2000. S. 207-267.
  18. Tushling B. Predislovie // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 4-kh t. M.: Kami, 1993. T. 1. Traktaty i stat'i (1784-1796). S. 6-41.
  19. Tushling B. Problema sistemy transtsendental'nogo idealizma v "Kritike sposobnosti suzhdeniya" // Kantovskii sbornik. Kaliningrad: Kaliningradskii universitet, 1991. Vyp. 16. S. 3-12.
  20. Khaidegger M. Vvedenie v metafiziku. SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 1998. 301 s.
  21. Shuman A. N. Transtsendental'naya filosofiya. Mn.: Ekonompress, 2002. 416 s.
  22. Beck L. W. A Commentary of Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963. 306 p.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru