GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Manuscript. Tambov: Gramota, 2019. № 1. P. 120-124.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2019.1.26

CONTROVERSIAL PROBLEMS OF ANTHROPOGENESIS THEORY

Shipelik Ol’ga Vasil’evna
Southern Federal University


Submitted: 15.11.2018
Abstract. The paper discusses the main controversial theses of the theory of anthropogenesis: leaps from Australopithecus to Arhanthropus and from Paleoanthropus to Neoanthropus, the direction of the hominids’ technological advances, the beginning and importance of tool activity, the role of hunting in anthropogenesis, the Neanderthals’ positions, and the appearance time of Homo sapiens. Basing on new scientific data of the end of the ХХ - the beginning of the ХХI century the conclusions are made on the applicability of dialectics laws to the anthropogenesis process cognition, the need to supplement the conception of anthropogenesis staging with species classification, on the continuity, non-linear and gradual nature of anthropogenesis. On the basis of new scientific discoveries in social and natural sciences, the main laws of human development have been conceptualized.
Key words and phrases: антропогенез, теория "двух скачков", диалектика, австралопитек, труд, род Homo, постепенность, многолинейность, anthropogenesis, theory of "two leaps", dialectics, Australopithecus, labour, Homo genus, gradualism, multilinearity
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Alekseev V. P. Stanovlenie chelovechestva. M.: Politizdat, 1984. 462 s.
  2. Andreev I. L. Proiskhozhdenie cheloveka i obshchestva: sovremennye problemy i kritika nemarksistskikh vzglyadov. M.: Mysl', 1982. 304 s.
  3. Anikovich M. V. Metodologiya arkheologii i novye podkhody k izucheniyu verkhnego paleolita Evrazii: izbrannye lektsii. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskii gos. un-t; In-t arkheologii i etnografii SO RAN, 2010. 56 s.
  4. Bazhutina T. O. Proiskhozhdenie cheloveka: kontseptsiya perekhodnykh sostoyanii razvitiya. Novosibirsk: Sibirskaya izdatel'skaya firma VO "Nauka", 1993. 156 s.
  5. Boriskovskii P. I. Drevneishee proshloe chelovechestva. L.: Nauka, 1979. 230 s.
  6. Vandermersh B. Fizicheskaya antropologiya neandertal'tsev i ikh sovremennikov: obshchii obzor // Istoriya chelovechestva: v 8-mi t. M.: UNESCO, 2003. T. 1. Doistoricheskie vremena i nachala tsivilizatsii / pod red. Z. Ya. de Laata. S. 118-124.
  7. Vorontsov V. Antroposotsiokul'turogenez v svete generalizuyushchei teorii // Filosofskaya antropologiya. 2016. T. 2. № 1. S. 23-41.
  8. Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk: v 3-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1974. T. 1. Nauka logiki. 452 s.
  9. Derevyanko A. P. Novye arkheologicheskie otkrytiya na Altae i problema formirovaniya Homo sapiens: lektsiya pamyati prof. Kh. Moviusa, prochitannaya v Garvardskom un-te / Rossiiskaya akad. nauk, Sib. otd-nie, In-t arkheologii i etnografii. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo IAET SO RAN, 2012. 132 s.
  10. Derevyanko A. P. Rodoslovnaya chelovechestva: teorii i fakty // Nauka iz pervykh ruk. 2010. № 4 (34). S. 20-37.
  11. Derevyanko A. P., Shun'kov M. V. Novaya model' formirovaniya cheloveka sovremennogo fizicheskogo vida // Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2012. T. 82. № 3. S. 202-226.
  12. Drobyshevskii S. Dostayushchee zveno: v 2-kh kn. M.: AST; CORPUS, 2017. Kn. 1. Obez'yany i vse-vse-vse. 672 s.
  13. Drobyshevskii S. Dostayushchee zveno: v 2-kh kn. M.: AST; CORPUS, 2017. Kn. 2. Lyudi. 592 s.
  14. Efimov Yu. I. Filosofskie problemy teorii antroposotsiogeneza. L.: Nauka, 1981. 192 s.
  15. Zadvornov A. N. Zarozhdenie razuma cheloveka: ot stadnogo k obshchestvennomu soznaniyu // Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i tekhnicheskie sistemy: issledovanie, proektirovanie, optimizatsiya. 2016. № 2 (69). S. 80-91.
  16. Zubov A. A. Novaya interpretatsiya roli "geidel'bergskogo cheloveka" v evolyutsii roda Homo // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2001. № 1. S. 91-111.
  17. Kazakov E. F. Problema nachala istorii // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 1 (61): v 4-kh t. T. 2. S. 211-215.
  18. Klesov A. A., Tyunyaev A. A. Proiskhozhdenie cheloveka (po dannym arkheologii, antropologii i DNK-genealogii). M.: Belye al'vy, 2010. 1024 s.
  19. Klimentov V. N. Filosofiya i problemy antroposotsiogeneza // Vestnik Donskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2015. № 2-3 (17). S. 15-30.
  20. Kozlova M. S. Evolyutsiya cheloveka: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee. M.: Nauka, 2015. 110 s.
  21. Kradin N. N. Itogi i perspektivy razvitiya arkheologii Dal'nego Vostoka // Vestnik Dal'nevostochnogo otdeleniya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2013. № 1. S. 10-20.
  22. Markov A. V. Evolyutsiya cheloveka: v 2-kh kn. M.: Astrel'; CORPUS, 2012. Kn. 1. Obez'yany, kosti i geny. 464 s.
  23. Moen Zh.-P. Doistoricheskii period v deistvii. Sovremennoe sostoyanie issledovanii (1988-2000) // Istoriya chelovechestva: v 8-mi t. M.: UNESCO, 2003. T. 1. Doistoricheskie vremena i nachala tsivilizatsii / pod red. Z. Ya. de Laata. S. 18-33.
  24. Porshnev B. F. O nachale chelovecheskoi istorii. Problemy paleopsikhologii. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2007. 714 s.
  25. Peabo S. Neandertalets. V poiskakh ischeznuvshikh genomov. M.: AST; CORPUS, 2017. 416 s.
  26. Ramchandra V. Dzhoshi. Yuzhnaya Aziya v period Homo habilis (chelovek umelyi) i Homo erectus (chelovek pryamokhodyashchii) // Istoriya chelovechestva: v 8-mi t. M.: UNESCO, 2003. T. 1. Doistoricheskie vremena i nachala tsivilizatsii / pod red. Z. Ya. de Laata. S. 96-103.
  27. Roginskii Ya. Ya. Problemy antropogeneza. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1969. 263 s.
  28. Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. M.: Nauka, 1966. 575 s.
  29. Tuman-Nikiforov A. A. Formirovanie chelovecheskoi dukhovnosti v protsesse antroposotsiogeneza // Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2011. № 4 (55). S. 183-189.
  30. Ustimenko D. L. Problema metodologii poznaniya antropogeneza // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. № 10 (60). Ch. 1. S. 185-188.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru