ARCHITECTURAL AND URBAN SPACE IN M. FOUCAULT’S BIOPOLITICAL CONCEPTION
Yakovleva Lyubov' Yur'evna
Saint Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Submitted: 14.11.2019
Abstract. The article is devoted to the problem of interrelation of biopolitics and architectural and urban space in M. Foucault’s philosophy. The research objective includes interpreting and analysing different types of architectural and urban space in M. Foucault’s works. In accordance with the research objective, its tasks are as follows: to trace the formation of biopolitical space, to reveal its influence on the body and life of the population; to suggest interpretation of M. Foucault’s architectural and urban conception in the context of the media theory; to justify M. Foucault’s understanding of architecture and city as political media. Originality of the study lies in the fact that M. Foucault’s architectural and urban space models are considered as special spatial and political forms of media.
Key words and phrases: власть, архитектурно-городское пространство, дисциплинарные пространства, биополитика, медиатеория, антирепрезентативность, power, architectural and urban space, disciplinary spaces, biopolitics, media theory, anti-representativeness
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Korbyuz'e L. Luchezarnyi gorod // Korbyuz'e L. Arkhitektura KhKh veka. M.: Progress, 1977. S. 121-142.
Maklyuen M. Ponimanie Media. Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka. M. - Zhukovskii: KANON-press-Ts; Kuchkovo pole, 2003. 464 s.
Orleanskii N. N. Prostranstvennyi aspekt biopoliticheskoi kontseptsii M. Fuko // Sravnitel'naya politika. 2014. T. 5. № 4 (16-17). S. 24-28.
Sokuler Z. A. Znanie i vlast': nauka v obshchestve moderna. SPb.: RKhGI, 2001. 240 s.
Fuko M. Bezopasnost', territoriya, naselenie. SPb.: Nauka, 2011. 544 s.
Fuko M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat'. Rozhdenie tyur'my. M.: Ad Marginem, 1999. 479 c.
Fuko M. Oko vlasti // Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu. M.: Praksis, 2002. Ch. 1. S. 220-249.
Fuko M. Prostranstvo, znanie i vlast' // Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu. M.: Praksis, 2006. Ch. 3. Stat'i i interv'yu, 1970-1984. S. 215-237.
Fuko M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki // Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu. M.: Praksis, 2006. Ch. 3. Stat'i i interv'yu, 1970-1984. S. 151-161.
Allen S. Infrastructure Urbanism // Points + Lines. Diagrams and Projects for the City. N. Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1999. P. 46-89.
Delitz H. Gebaute Gesellschaft. Architektur als Medium des Sozialen: Dis. Dresden: Techn. Univ., 2009. 367 S.
Delitz H. Gesellschaften der St?dte, Gesellschaften der Zelte // Blickpunkt Arch?ologie. 2018. № 3. S. 188-196.
Kittler F. A., Griffin M. The City Is a Medium // New Literary History. 1996. Vol. 27. № 4. Literature, Media, and the Law. P. 717-729.
Lemke T. The Government of Living Beings: Michel Foucault // Lemke T. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. N. Y.: New York University Press, 2011. P. 33-53.
Schabacher G. Unsichtbare Stadt. Zur Medialit?t urbaner Architekturen // Zeitschrift f?r Medienwissenschaft. Medien/ Architekturen. 2015. Heft 12. S. 79-90.
Sch?ffner W. Elemente architektonischer Medien // Zeitschrift f?r Medien- und Kulturforschung. 2010. № 1. S. 137-149.
Wallenstein S.-O. Foucault and the Genealogy of Modern Architecture // Wallenstein S.-O. Essays, Lectures. Stockholm: Axl Books, 2007. P. 361-404.
Русский
