Almanac of Modern Science and EducationPedagogy. Issues of Theory and PracticePhilological Sciences. Issues of Theory and PracticeHistorical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. <br>Issues of Theory and Practice

Procedure of Reviewing

Reviewing (expert evaluation) is realized to provide the high scientific and theoretic levels of Gramota Publishers journals, to select the most significant and topical (perspective) scholar works, to improve the quality of scientific materials under review.

Principles of reviewing

1. All the manuscripts are reviewed to be published in the journals of Gramota Publishers.

2. Reviewers are acknowledged Russian and foreign specialists with academic degrees who have enough qualification and research experience to assess scientific manuscripts.

3. Reviewing is conducted according to Publication ethics demands of Gramota Publishers.

4. All the reviews have been kept by the Editorial Staff for 5 years and may be sent to Oversight Body when getting the corresponding inquiry.

5. Reviewer is assigned by editor of the journal. Re-reviewing (examining of corrections) is realized by the reviewer who implemented primary reviewing.

Reviewing period

6. Reviewing (and re-reviewing) of scientific materials is implemented for 7 working days after date of directing them to reviewer.

Rules of scientific material evaluation

7. Reviewer evaluates an article according the following criteria:

  • compliance article with scientific and theoretical standard (topicality; scientific originality; practical value, problem statement, formulation of conclusions and argumentation of findings, suitability of references to research area);
  • compliance article with standard of material presentation (suitability of article heading to its content; suitability of article summary to its content; suitability of article extent to its content; choice of key words and phrases; logic, interconnection and quality of the presented material).

8. Assessments according to each criterion are written in a review with comments if they are necessary.

9. Reviewing is resulted in the conclusions about scientific material compliance with the qualifying standards, necessity of scientific material improvement, possibility of scientific material publication.

Resolution on publication

10. Basing on reviewers conclusions the Editorial Staff make a decision:

  • to publish a scientific article;
  • to refer scientific article to author for its improvement;
  • to decline article.

11. Accepted decision is brought to authors notice.

12. Editor sends reviews copies, recommendations on article improvement or reasoned refusal to the authors of the presented materials.

13. Author may not agree with some reviewers recommendations. In this case he may prepare well-reasoned answer.


GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals

Periodicals

Almanac of Modern Science and Education
Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and Practice
Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice
Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice

Official Documents

Procedure of scientific articles publication
Procedure of reviewing
Publication ethics
License Agreement

2006-2017 GRAMOTA Publishers

The use of works from Archive of Scientific Articles for commercial purposes is not allowed. They should be used with compulsory
reference to the names of the authors of these works and the rightholder Gramota Publishers.


site development and search engine optimization: krav.ru