|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
THE USA POLITICAL SCIENTISTS ABOUT CIVIL CONTROL OVER ARMED FORCES: P. FEAVER VS. S. HUNTINGTON
|
Rim Shagalievich Mustaev
Tatar State Classical Pedagogical University
|
|
Submitted:
September 10, 2011
|
|
Abstract.
The author analyzes the basic points of S. Huntington and P. Feaver's theories about civil control over armed forces. In S. Huntington's theory civil control is provided by military professionalism, in P. Feaver's neo-institutional approach the strategic interaction of civilians and military men and the possibility of civilians' sanctions in relation to military men are emphasized.
|
Key words and phrases:
гражданский контроль
военно-гражданские отношения
военный профессионализм
неоинституциональный подход
civil control
military-civil relations
military professionalism
neo-institutional approach
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Гольц А. Армия России: одиннадцать потерянных лет. М.: Захаров, 2004. 224 с.
- Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: Фонд экономической книги «Начала», 1997. 180 с.
- Олсон М. Логика коллективных действий: общественные блага и теория групп. М.: Фонд экономической инициативы, 1995. 165 с.
- Уильямсон О. И. Природа фирмы / С. Дж. Уинтер. М.: Дело, 2001. 360 с.
- Feaver P. D. Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Pr., 2005. 381 р.
- Feaver P. D. The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz and the Question of Civilian Control // Armed Forces & Society. 1996. Vol. 23. № 2. Р. 149-178.
- Huntington S. P. Reforming Civil-Military Relations // Civil-Military Relations and Democracy / ed. by L. Diamond, M. Plattner. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Pr., 1995. P.3-13.
- Huntington S. P. The Soldier and the State: the Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambr. (Mass.): Belknap Pr. of Harvard Univ. Pr., 1957. 534 р.
- Nielsen S. C. Civil-Military Relations and Military Effectiveness // Public Administration and Management. 2005. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 61-84.
|
