|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
GENDER ASYMMETRY OF STATUS-ROLE DISTRIBUTION IN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS OF RUSSIA AND THE USA (COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS)
|
Anna Borisovna Ostapenko
Khabarovsk State Academy of Economics and Law
|
|
Submitted:
July 25, 2014
|
|
Abstract.
The article is devoted to the problem of gender asymmetry in the educational systems of Russia and the United States. The author presents a comparative analysis of the status-role positions of women and men in educational institutions of different levels of quality and prestigiousness. Statistical data show a common tendency for international educational space - the lower the level of the educational institution is, the fewer men are on the staff, the higher the level is - the fewer women are on the staff. Thus, the studies show that gender criterion has been playing an important role in the educational systems of both Russia and other countries.
|
Key words and phrases:
гендерная асимметрия
гендер
статусно-ролевые позиции
система образования
профессиональная занятость
гендерный дисбаланс
gender asymmetry
gender
status-role positions
educational system
professional employment
gender imbalance
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Рощин С. Ю., Солнцев С. А. Кто преодолевает «стеклянный потолок»: вертикальная гендерная сегрегация в российской экономике: препринт WP4/2006/03. М.: ГУВШЭ, 2006. 52 с.
- Силласте Г. Гендерная асимметрия в российской системе высшего образования и ее возможные социальные последствия в условиях перехода к рыночной экономике / отв. ред. Г. Силласте. М.: ФА, 2002. Ч. I. Методология и методика социологического исследования. 168 с.
- Anker R. Theories of Occupational Segregation by Sex: an Overview // International Labor Review. 1997. Vol. 136. № 3. P. 315-339.
- Bernard J. Academic Women. Pensilvania, 1964. 331 p.
- Jaschik S. “Quiet Desperation” of Academic Women. 2008.
- Monroe K., Ozyurt S. Gender Equality in Academia: Bad News from the Trenches and some Possible Solutions, Perspectives on Politics. 2008. Vol. 6. Issues 2. Р. 215-233.
|
