Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Theory & Practice. 2015. Issue 9-1
COLLECTION:    Law Sciences

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

DOCTRINE OF RECOGNITION AND EXECUTION OF FOREIGN COURT VERDICTS IN THE USA PROCEDURAL LAW: BASIC ASPECTS AND PROBLEMS

Natal'ya Leonidovna Potorochina
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Submitted: September 1, 2015
Abstract. The article examines the basic aspects of the American doctrine of the recognition and execution of foreign court verdicts, its key acts and judicial precedents. In Russian juridical science the comprehensive analysis of the doctrine has not been carried out in spite of the growing number of civil cases examined under American jurisdiction with the participation of Russian citizens. The author indicates that the doctrine of recognition was formed in judicial practice in connection with Hilton v. Guyot case examined in 1895 and later on was developed in unified federal acts and state laws. The researcher identifies certain problems existing in law enforcement practice.
Key words and phrases:
иностранные судебные решения
доктрина признания иностранных решений
международный гражданский процесс
процессуальное право США
судопроизводство в США с участием иностранных лиц
foreign court verdicts
doctrine of recognition of foreign verdicts
international civil procedure
the USA procedural law
legal procedure in the USA with the participation of foreigners
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Конституция Соединенных Штатов Америки 1787 г. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.constitutionfacts.com/ content/constitution/files/USConstitution_Russian.pdf (дата обращения: 25.04.2015).
  2. Born G., Rutledge P. International Civil Litigation in United States Courts. N. Y.: Wolters Kluwer, 2011. 1296 p.
  3. Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act of 1962 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.uniformlaws.org/Act Summary.aspx?title=Foreign%20Money%20Judgments%20Recognition%20Act (дата обращения: 21.04.2015).
  4. Hilton v. Guyot. 159 U.S. 113 (1895) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/159/113/case.html (дата обращения: 19.04.2015).
  5. Pell O., Spielberger P. U.S. Courts Turn Cold on Foreign Plaintiffs // International Financial Law Review. 2004. № 6. P. 144-168.
  6. Society of Lloyd’s v. Ashenden [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1287031.html (дата обращения: 20.04.2015).
  7. Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act of 2005 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.uniformlaws. org/shared/docs/foreign%20country%20money%20judgments%20recognition/ufcmjra_final_05.pdf (дата обращения: 18.04.2015).
  8. Whytock C., Robertson C. Forum Non Conveniens and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments // Columbia Law Review. 2011. Vol. 111. № 7. P. 1444-1521.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing