|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
FATALISM AND PERMISSIVENESS. oPPOSITION OF FATALISM AND FREEDOM
|
Aslan Gusaevich Gadzhikurbanov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
|
|
Submitted:
April 1, 2015
|
|
Abstract.
The classical tradition in ethics postulates the alternativeness of moral choice. In this sense moral freedom turns to be principally inconsistent with the traditional idea of fatalism. At the same time the experience of the history of moral doctrines, in particular ethics by Spinoza, shows that predetermination and freedom don’t exclude each other at all. Moreover the most rigid version of fatalism results in an unexpected consequence - the principal permissiveness while fulfilling moral deeds.
|
Key words and phrases:
Спиноза
возможность выбора
моральная свобода
фатализм
произвольное действие
предопределенность
вседозволенность
естественное право
стоический детерминизм
Spinoza
possibility of choice
moral freedom
fatalism
arbitrary action
predetermination
permissiveness
natural law
stoic determinism
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Аристотель. Сочинения: в 4-х т. М., 1984. Т. 4. Мысль. 831 с.
- Спиноза Б. Сочинения: в 2-х т. Изд-е 2-е. СПб.: Наука, 1999. Т. 1. 489 с.
- Столяров А. А. Стоя и стоицизм. М.: АО КАМИ ГРУП, 1995. 442 с.
- Bobzien S. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. CLARENDON PRESS OXFORD, 1998. 441 p.
- Brennan T. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties and Fate. Oxford, 2005. 327 p.
- Forschner M. Die Stoische Ethik: ueber den Zusammenhang von Natur- Sprach- und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart, 1981. 327 S.
- Marcus Aurelius. Ad se ipsum / ed. J. Dalfen. Leipzig, 1979. 177 p.
- Matheron A. Individu et commonaute chez Spinoza. P.: Minuit, 1988. 681 р.
- Rist J. M. Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge, 1969. 256 р.
- Tsekourakis D. Studies in the Terminology of Early Stoic Ethics. Wiesbaden, 1974. 139 p.
|
