Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Manuscript. 2021. Volume 14. Issue 4
COLLECTION:    Social Philosophy

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

Plato’s and Aristotle’s Socio-Political Views in the Context of Modern Conceptions on Political Corruption Nature

Viktor Evgenievich Vezlomtsev
Academy of Law and Management of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Ryazan


Submitted: April 30, 2021
Abstract. The paper aims to reveal discrepancy of two basic approaches to defining corruption - contextualism and moralism. The study is based on comparing the ancient Greek philosophers’ views on corruption. The article analyses philosophical systems of Ancient Greece taking into account modern understanding of corruption. Scientific originality of the research involves justifying the thesis that in the ancient Greek thinkers’ works, any political regime is apriori considered corrupt, and supremacy of law is considered not as non-corruption in the government but as a practical means to prevent corrupt behaviour of power holders responsible for making national-scale decisions. As a result, the researcher concludes that the ancient Greek philosophers’ views are not in tune with moral absolutism, the prevailing tone of modern discussions on corruption.
Key words and phrases:
политическая коррупция
мораль
Античность
Платон
Аристотель
political corruption
morality
Antiquity
Plato
Aristotle
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Аристотель. Сочинения: в 4-х т. / под общ. ред. А. И. Доватура. М.: Мысль, 1984. Т. 4. 830 с.
  2. Бондаренко С. В. Коррумпированные общества. Ростов-на-Дону: Госиздат, 2002. 378 с.
  3. Максимов С. В. Коррупция. Закон. Ответственность. М.: Центр ЮрИнфоР, 2000. 310 с.
  4. Платон. Диалоги. Книга вторая. М.: Эксмо, 2008. 1360 с.
  5. Римский В. Л. Коррупционные сети. Гражданские инициативы и предотвращение коррупции. СПб.: Норма, 2000. 567 с.
  6. Bonitz H. Index Aristotelicus. Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1955. 878 р.
  7. DeLeon P. Thinking about political corruption. Armonk - L.: M. E. Sharpe, 1993. 243 р.
  8. Heidenheimer A. J. Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis. N. Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970. 582 p.
  9. Heywood P. Political corruption: Problems and perspectives // Political Studies. 1997. Vol. 45. Iss. 4. Р. 417-435.
  10. Nozick R. Anarchy, state and utopia. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1974. 361 p.
  11. Philp M. Defining political corruption // Political Studies. 1997. Vol. 45. Iss. 3. Р. 436-462.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing