Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Pedagogy. Theory & Practice. 2022. Volume 7. Issue 4
COLLECTION:    Vocational Education

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

Formative Assessment of Students’ Academic Achievements in Primary General Education: Teacher Training

Elena Nikolaevna Zemlyanskaya
Moscow Pedagogical State University
Submitted: May 23, 2022
Abstract. The aim of the study is to substantiate the need for assessment competence formation in future teachers. The paper identifies the issues of introducing formative assessment into schools and suggests a strategy for preparing future teachers to use these tools in their professional activities. Scientific novelty of the study lies in proving the connection between the formation of future teachers’ competence in the use of formative assessment techniques when conducting lessons at school and their research and reflexive independence in their own professional training at university. As a result, the researcher has proposed formative assessment procedures that can be implemented in professional teacher training, has provided insight into the methodology of their implementation, substantiated the techniques. Experimental teaching carried out in a number of universities has shown positive dynamics in the formation of future teachers’ competence in the use of formative assessment tools in their activities.
Key words and phrases:
формирующее оценивание
образовательные достижения учащихся
начальное общее образование
оценочная компетентность
профессиональная подготовка учителей
formative assessment
students’ academic achievements
primary general education
assessment competence
professional teacher training
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Выготский Л. С. Собрание сочинений: в 6-ти т. М., 1983. Т. 3.
  2. Землянская Е. Н. Безотметочное оценивание образовательных достижений в начальной школе // Наука и школа. 2019. № 3. DOI: 10.24412/Ffl18O2Q06Q
  3. Землянская Е. Н. Критериальное оценивание образовательных достижений студентов вуза // Педагогика. Вопросы теории и практики. 2020. Т. 5. Вып. 2. DOI: 10.30853/pedagogy.2020.2.2
  4. Землянская Е. Н. Новые формы оценивания образовательных результатов студентов // Психолого-педагогические исследования. 2015. Т. 7. № 4. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2015070410
  5. Землянская Е. Н. Формирующее оценивание (оценка для обучения) образовательных достижений обучающихся // Современная зарубежная психология. 2016. Т. 5. № 3. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2016050305
  6. Землянская Е. Н., Галямова Э. М., Безбородова М. А. Нелинейная педагогическая система университетской подготовки учителя в информационном обществе // Образовательное пространство в информационную эпоху: сб. науч. тр. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. / под ред. С. В. Ивановой. М., 2018. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2018.09.02.99
  7. Чандра М. Ю., Байкина Е. А. Стратегии оценивания компетенций студентов в процессе освоения образовательной программы вуза // Известия Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета. 2018. № 7 (130).
  8. Ainsworth L.Common Formative Assessment: An Overview. Corwin: The Leadership and Learning Center, 2009.
  9. Beregovaya E. B., Zemlyanskaya E. N., Larionova I. A., Yakushevskaya K. N., Timirov F. F., Medzhidova K. O., Ignatov S. B. Pedagogical Technologies for Social and Cultural Reflection Formation in Modern Students // Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 1.
  10. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D. Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom // Phi Delta Kappan. 2004. Vol. 86 (1).
  11. Cansiz M., Cansiz N. How Do Sources of Self-Efficacy Predict Preservice Teachers’ Beliefs Related to Constructivist and Traditional Approaches to Teaching and Learning? // SAGE Open. 2019. Vol. 9. Iss. 4.
  12. Colby S., Lambert M., McGee J. Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous Improvement // SAGE Open. 2016. Vol. 6. Iss. 4. DOI: 10.1177/2158244016673131
  13. Fullan M., Quinn J. Coherence. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, 2016.
  14. Heritage M. Formative Assessment: Making It Happen in the Classroom. Corwin, 2010.
  15. Moradi S., Faghiharam B., Ghasempour K. Relationship between Group Learning and Interpersonal Skills with Emphasis on the Role of Mediating Emotional Intelligence among High School Students // SAGE Open. 2018. Vol. 8. Iss. 2. DOI: 10.1177/2158244018782734
  16. Platonova R. I., Zaitseva N. A., Zemlyanskaya E. N., Bezborodova M. A., Stepanov P. A., Mikhina G. B. Nonlinear Development of University Pedagogical System: Permanence of Didactic Tasks // Man in India (Man India). 2017. Vol. 97 (14).
  17. Slavin R. E. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. 12th ed. N. Y.: Pearson, 2018.
  18. Walahoski J., Suzanne L. M. A Multi-Tiered Approach to Evaluating a Nonformal Youth Development Program // Journal on Youth Development. 2012. Vol. 7. No. 2.
  19. Wong A. C. K. Considering Reflection from the Student Perspective in Higher Education // SAGE Open. 2016. Vol. 6. Iss. 1. DOI: 10.1177/2158244016638706
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing