|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
COMPETITORS OF TWO-SOURCE HYPOTHESIS IN MODERN TEXTUAL CRITICISM OF NEW TESTAMENT
|
Aleksandr Vladilenovich Arapov
Financial University under Government of the Russian Federation
|
|
Submitted:
February 25, 2013
|
|
Abstract.
The author discusses the various hypotheses suggested for the solution to the synoptic problem. For a long time the dominant solution to this problem was a two-source hypothesis. Today, many researchers believe that a two-source hypothesis should be rejected, and suggest various alternative hypotheses. Farrer hypothesis asserts the priority of Mark. Augustinian hypothesis and two-gospel hypothesis assert the priority of Matthew. Jerusalem school hypothesis asserts the priority of Luke. The author mentions that as for the synoptic problem there is no consensus.
|
Key words and phrases:
текстология Нового Завета
синоптическая проблема
гипотеза двух источников
гипотеза Фаррера
Августинианская гипотеза
гипотеза двух Евангелий
гипотеза Иерусалимской школы
Эта Линнеман
textual criticism of New Testament
synoptic problem
two-source hypothesis
Farrer hypothesis
Augustinian hypothesis
two-gospel hypothesis
Jerusalem school hypothesis
Eta Linnemann
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- BenDavid A. Biblical Hebrew and Mishnaic Hebrew. Tel Aviv: Dvir, 1967. 942 p.
- Edwards J. R. The Hebrew Gospel & the Development of the Synoptic Tradition. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2009. 376 p.
- Farmer W. R. The Gospel of Jesus: The Pastoral Relevance of the Synoptic Problem. Louisville: Westminster, 1994. 240 p.
- Farrer A. M. On Dispensing with Q // Studies in the Gospels: Essays in Memory of R. H. Lightfoot. Oxford: Blackwell, 1955. P. 55-58.
- Gundry R. H. Matthew: A Commentary on His Literary and Theological Art. Michigan: Eerdmans, 1982. 690 p.
- Lindsey R. L. A Hebrew Translation of the Gospel of Mark: A Greek-Hebrew Diglot with English Introduction. Jerusalem: Dugith Publishers, 1973. 159 p.
- Lindsey R. L. A Modified Two-Document Theory of the Synoptic Dependence and Interdependence // Novum Testamentum. 1963. Vol. 6. P. 239-263.
- Linnemann E. Gibt es ein synoptisches Problem? Nürnberg: Verl. für Theologie und Religionswiss, 1999. 191 S.
- Morgenthaler R. Statistik des Neutestamentlichen Wortschafzes. Zürich: Gotthelf, 1982. 187 S.
- Orchard B., Riley H. The Order of the Synoptics: Why Three Synoptic Gospels? Macon: Mercer University Press, 1987. 294 p.
- Parker P. The Gospel before Mark. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953. 266 p.
- Segal M. H. Mishnaic Hebrew and its Relation to Biblical Hebrew and to Aramaic // Jewish Quarterly Review. 1908. Vol. 20. P. 647-737.
- Streeter B. H. The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins. London: Macmillan, 1924. 624 p.
- The Greek New Testament. Fourth Revised Edition / Editors B. Aland, K. Aland, J. Karavidopoulos, C. M. Martini, and B. M. Metzger. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellshaft, 1994. 979 p.
- Ward Powers B. The Progressive Publication of Matthew. Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2010. 624 p.
- Wenham J. Redating Matthew, Mark, and Luke. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1991. 319 p.
|
|
Русский
