Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2013. Issue 12-2
COLLECTION:    Philological Sciences

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

GENDER AND COMMUNICATIVE STYLE IN ENGLISH-SPEAKING SOCIETY

Svetlana Petrovna Ermakovich
Baltic Fishing Fleet State Academy


Submitted: November 22, 2013
Abstract. The article is devoted to the theory of intergroup relations and social changes that are manifested in the features of verbal behaviour of men and women. Different ways of higher social status achievement by subordinate group members, as well as common stereotypes of masculinity, by which means men are socialized, are considered. Attention is paid to the fact that the cooperative communicative style, typical of women, is more functional in comparison with the competitive style inherent to men.
Key words and phrases:
гендер
коммуникативный стиль
стереотип
лингвистический стандарт
маскулинность
фемининность
gender
communicative style
stereotype
linguistic standard
masculinity, femininity
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Калугина Е. Н. Теоретико-методологические основы гендерных исследований в лингвистике: состояние и перспективы // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. Тамбов: Грамота, 2013. № 7 (25). Ч. I. C. 79-81.
  2. Кирилина А. В. Гендер: лингвистические аспекты. М.: Институт социологии РАН, 1999. 180 с.
  3. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 281 p.
  4. Coates J. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. London – N. Y.: Longman, 1993. 228 p.
  5. Deuchar M. A Pragmatic Account of Women’s Use of Standard Speech // Women in Their Speech Communities / J. Coates, D. Cameron (eds.). London: Longman, 1989. P. 27-32.
  6. Holmes J. Women, Men and Politeness. London – N. Y.: Longman, 1995. 254 p.
  7. Levant R. F. Men and Masculinity // Encyclopedia of Women and Gender: Sex Similarities and Differences and the Impact of Society on Gender / J. Worell (ed.). San Diego, California: Academic Press, 2001. Vol. 2. P. 717-727.
  8. Scott J. W. Millennial Fantasies: The Future of «Gender» in the 21st Century [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://kcgs. org.ua/RUSSIAN/text.html (дата обращения: 20.08.2013).
  9. Spertus E. Why are There so Few Female Computer Scientists? [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://stuff.mit.edu /afs/sipb/user/ghudson/info/csfem.txt (дата обращения: 20.08.2013).
  10. Tajfel H. The Social Psychology of Minorities. Minority Rights Group, 1978. 20 p.
  11. Tannen D. That’s Not What I Meant! London: Vigaro Press, 1998. 180 p.
  12. Young S. CT Resources: Judith Butler Essay by Sally Young [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.theory.org.uk/ ctr-b-e1.htm (дата обращения: 20.08.2013).
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing