Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2014. Issue 10-3
COLLECTION:    Philological Sciences

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

DISCURSIVE PARTICLES AS INDICATORS OF OBSERVING AND VIOLATING THE NORMS OF POLITENESS

Marina Lazarevna Avakova
Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University


Submitted: September 20, 2014
Abstract. The article is devoted to investigating the pragmatic characteristics of discursive particles (‘just’, ‘simply’ ‘really’, ‘quite’, ‘nearly’) in the situations of observing and violating the norms of politeness. The special attention is paid to the shades of meanings of discursive particles in the various contexts. The author finds out that discursive particles, manifesting themselves as downtoners or emphasizers/maximizers, function as indicators of observing or violating the norms of politeness.
Key words and phrases:
дискурсивные частицы
ликоущемляющие речевые акты
эффект смягчения
эффект усиления
вежливость
невежливость
downtoner
emphasizer
maximizer
discursive particles
offensive speech acts
downtoning effect
emphasizing effect
politeness
impoliteness
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Беляева Е. И. Принцип вежливости в речевом общении // Иностранные языки в школе. 1985. № 2. С. 12-17.
  2. Карасик В. И. Язык социального статуса. М.: Гнозис, 2002. 333 с.
  3. Кузьменкова Ю. Б. Азы вежливого общения: учебное пособие. Обнинск: Титул, 2001. 112 с.
  4. Ларина Т. В. Вежливость как отражение социально-культурных отношений (на примере английской и русской коммуникативных культур) // Вестник МГУ. Сер. 19. Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. М., 2003. № 4. С. 139-149.
  5. Хесед Л. А. Категория вежливости и описывающая ее лексика // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. Тамбов: Грамота, 2013. № 6 (64). Ч. II. С. 195-199.
  6. Aijmer K. English Discourse Particles. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2002. 298 p.
  7. Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 450 p.
  8. Bushnell C. Trading Up. London, 2009. 548 p.
  9. Culpeper J. Toward an Anatomy of Impoliteness // Journal of Pragmatics. 1996. № 25. P. 349-367.
  10. Culpeper J., Bousfield D., Wichmann A. Impoliteness Revisited: with Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects // Journal of Pragmatics. 2003. № 35. P. 1545-1579.
  11. Diamond J. Status and Power in Verbal Interaction: A study of Discourse in a Close-knit Social Network. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1996. 180 p.
  12. Fraser B. Perspectives on Politeness // Journal of Pragmatics. 1990. № 14. P. 219-235.
  13. Goffman E. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon, 1967. 296 p.
  14. House J., Kasper G. Politeness Markers in English and German // Conversational Routine / ed. by Florian Coulmas. The Hague: Mouton, 1981. P. 157-185.
  15. Labov W. Intensity // Meaning, Form and Use in Context. Linguistic Applications / ed. by D. Schiffrin. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1984. P. 43-70.
  16. Lachenicht L. G. Aggravating Language: a Study of Abusive and Insulting Language // International Journal of Human Communication. 1980. № 13 (4). P. 607-688.
  17. Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. N. Y.: Longman, 1983. 250 p.
  18. Meier A. J. Passages of Politeness // Journal of Pragmatics. 1995. № 24. P. 381-392.
  19. Priestley J. B. Dangerous Corner. М.: Менеджер, 1997. 208 с.
  20. Priestley J. B. Time and the Conways. М.: Менеджер, 1997. 208 с.
  21. Shaffer P. Five Finger Exercise. Modern English Drama. M.: Raduga Publishers, 1984. P. 33-156.
  22. Wesker A. Modern English Plays. M.: Progress Publishers, 1966. 382 p.
  23. Williams T. A Streetcar Named Desire. Penguin Books, Ltd., 1978. 313 p.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing