Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2018. Issue 8-2
COLLECTION:    Linguistics

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF LINGUISTIC MEANS AS A RESEARCH METHOD OF SUGGESTION PHENOMENON IN THE MODERN ENGLISH LANGUAGE (BY THE MATERIAL OF ANALYTICAL ARTICLES)

Anna Robertovna Davydova
Armavir State Pedagogical University

Mariana Robertovna Sarkisyan
Pyatigorsk State University


Submitted: August 1, 2018
Abstract. The article is devoted to the study of the linguistic means of suggestive influence in English analytical articles. The texts of analytical articles that are complex structures, whose pragmatic content is impact on the reader with the purpose of suggesting and forming unconscious attitudes, are considered. The work aims at conducting the contextual analysis of linguistic means for studying the phenomenon of suggestion in modern English. The researchers develop the thesis that in order to form certain beliefs and to increase influencing force in the analytical newspaper text, the author of the article resorts to the means of suggestive influence, using the suggestive potential of lexico-syntactic means. The analysis of linguistic material has shown that the presence of lexico-syntactic means in the text space of newspapers realizes a new turn of perception that opens the field of suggestion.
Key words and phrases:
суггестия
суггестивный потенциал языковых средств
воздействующая функция
контекстный анализ
аналитическая статья
suggestion
suggestive potential of linguistic means
influencing function
contextual analysis
analytical article
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Гончаров Г. А. Суггестия: теория и практика. М., 1995. 147 с.
  2. Доценко Е. Л. Психология манипуляции. Феномены, механизмы, защита. М.: ЧеРо, 2000. 344 с.
  3. Инжечик А. А. Средства суггестивного речевого воздействия в политическом дискурсе [Электронный ресурс] // Молодой ученый. 2016. № 9 (113). URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/113/28879/ (дата обращения: 20.05.2018).
  4. Кара-Мурза С. Г. Манипуляция сознанием. М.: Алгоритм, 2000. 734 с.
  5. Полуйкова С. Ю. Средства суггестивного речевого воздействия в современном просветительском послании // Вестник Пермского университета. 2013. Вып. 3 (19). С. 45-50.
  6. Стернин И. А. Основы речевого воздействия: учебное издание. Воронеж: Истоки, 2012. 178 с.
  7. Черепанова И. Ю. Вербальная суггестия: теория, методика, социально-лингвистический эксперимент: автореф. дисс. … д. филол. н. М., 1996. 50 с.
  8. Шелестюк Е. В. Речевое воздействие: онтология и методология исследования: монография. Челябинск: Энциклопедия, 2008. 229 с.
  9. Coughlin C. For all its bluster about Syrian air strikes provoking armageddon, Russia has shown itself to be a paper tiger [Электронный ресурс] // The Telegraph. 2018. 17 April. URL: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/17/bluster-syrian-air-strikes-provoking-armageddon-russia-has-shown (дата обращения: 25.05.2018).
  10. Sengupta K., Dearden L. Sergei Skripal: Former double agent may have been poisoned with nerve agent over ‘freelance’ spying, sources say [Электронный ресурс] // The Independent. 2018. 8 March. URL: http://www.independent.co.uk/ news/uk/crime/sergei-skripal-freelance-spying-targeted-russian-spy-double-agent-poisoning-nerve-agent-salisbury-a8246686.html (дата обращения: 25.05.2018).
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing