Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2022. Volume 15. Issue 2
COLLECTION:    Applied and Mathematical Linguistics

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

Linguocognitive Modelling of the US Election Discourse during the Global Pandemic

Diana Ildusovna Kasimova
The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow

Lidia Mikhailovna Grigoryeva
Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow


Submitted: February 28, 2022
Abstract. The research aims to determine the cognitive models used in election campaign speeches by the 2020 US presidential candidates and identify a possible shift in the electorate’s value orientations during the crisis period of the global pandemic. Donald Trump’s and Joseph Biden’s speech corpora, totalling approximately 479 thousand tokens, served as linguistic material for a quantitative and qualitative analysis. The research is novel in that it is the first to identify and analyse the shift of the prevailing cognitive model of the current US political discourse in the light of crisis events. The research findings make it possible to suggest that the shift of the priority cognitive model in favour of the Nurturant Parent Model (with the Strict Father Model being previously dominant) occurred amidst the unfolding global pandemic.
Key words and phrases:
когнитивная лингвистика
политический дискурс
предвыборный дискурс
cognitive linguistics
political discourse
electoral discourse
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Баранов А. Н. Предисловие редактора. Когнитивная теория метафоры почти 20 лет спустя // Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М. Метафоры, которыми мы живем. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2004.
  2. Соссюр Ф. де. Курс общей лингвистики / пер. с фр. Екатеринбург: Урал. университет, 1999.
  3. Чудинов А. П. Россия в метафорическом зеркале: когнитивное исследование политической метафоры (1991-2000): монография / Урал. гос. пед. ун-т. Екатеринбург, 2001.
  4. Штейнман М. А. Матрицы массовой культуры и механизмы создания общности в политическом дискурсе XXI в. // Вестник Российского государственного гуманитарного университета. Серия «Политология. История. Международные отношения». 2012. № 1 (82).
  5. Donald Trump Transcripts. 2022. URL: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcript-category/donald-trump-transcripts
  6. Joe Biden Speech and Interview Transcripts. 2022. URL: https://factba.se/biden/transcripts
  7. Kasimova D. I. Framing within H. Clinton’s and D. Trump’s Political Discourse. Proceedings of the 12th All-Russian Research and Methodological Conference with International Participation (Moscow, Institute of Foreign Languages, RUDN University, March 27, 2020). Moscow: PFUR, 2020. URL: http://science-ifl.rudn.ru/09835-2020-445-454 DOI: 10.22363/09835-2020-445-454
  8. Lakoff G. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
  9. Lakoff G. The Neural Theory of Metaphor // The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor / ed. by R. Gibbs. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  10. Volkova Y. A. Cognitive Linguoecology as a Methodological Approach to the Study of Destructive Communication // SHS Web of Conferences. 2020. Vol. 88. Iss. 3.
All issues


© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishing