Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2025. Volume 18. Issue 7
COLLECTION:    Applied Linguistics

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

Features of the functioning of formulaic organizing markers of argumentation in German and Russian scientific texts in a comparative aspect

Kristina Valerievna Manerova
Saint Petersburg University

Tatiana Vladimirovna Khakhaleva
Saint Petersburg University


Submitted: July 24, 2025
Abstract. The aim of the study is to establish the range of meanings and features of the logical-pragmatic classes of formulaic organizing markers of argumentation in German and Russian scientific texts, also in quantitative terms. The article presents a definition of a formulaic marker of argumentation and conducts a comparative analysis of the use of these units in German and Russian scientific texts. The scientific novelty of the research lies in introducing the concept of formulaic marker of argumentation into scientific discourse, in identifying classes and distinctive features of markers that are essential for the organization of German and Russian scientific texts in cognitive sciences. As a result, a foundation is created for the subsequent classification of formulaic markers of argumentation based on previously unexplored material. The article highlights German and Russian examples of the functioning of organizing formulaic markers of argumentation in three classes: “generalization”, “repeated reference to the subject of discussion”, and “reference to someone else’s opinion”, in a comparative perspective.
Key words and phrases:
маркеры аргументации
формульные маркеры в русском и немецком языках
дискурсивные маркеры
научный текст
markers of argumentation
formulaic markers in Russian and German
discourse markers
scientific text
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Баранов А. Н., Плунгян В. А., Рахилина Е. В. Путеводитель по дискурсивным словам русского языка. М.: Помовский и партнеры, 1993.
  2. Манёрова К. В. К вопросу формульности устойчивых прагмем в немецком языке // Германистика-2023: nove et nova. М., 2024.
  3. Некрасова М. Ю., Миронцева С. С., Байко В. А. Маркеры аргументации в англоязычных научных статьях гуманитарного и естественно-научного направлений // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2021. № 11. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil210550
  4. Пиотровский Д. Д. Формульная техника фарерских баллад // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература. 2020. Т. 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2020.207
  5. Buerki A. (How) is Formulaic Language Universal? Insights from Korean, German and English // Filatkina N., Stumpf S., Pfeiffer C. Formulaic Language and New Data Theoretical and Methodological Implications. Berlin − Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110669824-005
  6. Frasеr B. An aссоunt оf disсоursе markеrs // Intеrnatiоnal Rеviеw оf Pragmatiсs. 2009. Vоl. 1.
  7. Frasеr B. What arе disсоursе markеrs? // Jоurnal оf Pragmatiсs. 1999. Vоl. 31.
  8. Kоnоnеnkо I., Sidоrоva Е., Kuznеtsоv S., Panоv A. Dеvеlоpmеnt оf thе Lеxiсоn оf Argumеntatiоn Indiсatоrs // Соmmuniсatiоns in Соmputеr and Infоrmatiоn Sсiеnсе. 2019. Vоl. 1093.
  9. Shiffrin D. Disсоursе markеrs. N. Y.: Сambridgе Univеrsity Prеss, 1987.
  10. Shiffrin D., Tannеn D., Hamiltоn H. Е. Thе Handbооk оf Disсоursе Analysis. Padstоw: Blaсkwеll publishеrs, 2001.
  11. Stеin S. Fоrmеlhaftе Spraсhе. Untеrsuсhungеn zu ihrеn pragmatisсhеn und kоgnitivеn Funktiоnеn im gеgеnwärtigеn Dеutsсh. Frankfurt am Main: Pеtеr Lang, 1995.
  12. Szerszunowicz J. New Pragmatic Idioms in Polish: An Integrated Approach in Pragmateme Research // Filatkina N., Stumpf S., Pfeiffer C. Formulaic Language and New Data. Theoretical and Methodological Implications. Berlin − Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110669824-008
  13. Tоldоva S., Pisarеvskaya D., Ananyеva M., Kоbоzеva M., Nasеdkin A., Nikifоrоva S., Pavlоva I., Shеlеpоv A. Rhеtоriсal rеlatiоns markеrs in Russian RST Trееbank // Prосееdings оf thе 6th Wоrkshоp оn Rесеnt Advanсеs in RST and Rеlatеd Fоrmalisms. 2017.
  14. Tsеrоnis A. Frоm Соnnесtivеs tо Argumеntativе Markеrs: A Quеst fоr Markеrs оf Argumеntativе Mоvеs and оf Rеlatеd Aspесts оf Argumеntativе Disсоursе // Argumеntatiоn. 2011. Vоl. 25.
  15. van Dijk T. A. Pragmatiс соnnесtivеs // Jоurnal оf Pragmatiсs. 1979. Vоl. 3.
  16. van Ееmеrеn F. H., Hоutlоssеr P., Snоесk Hеnkеmans F. Argumеntativе indiсatоrs. A Pragma-Dialесtiсal Study. Dоrdrесht: Springеr, 2007.
  17. Wеinriсh H., vоn Thurmair M., Brеindl Е., Willkоp Е-A. Tеxtgrammatik dеr dеutsсhеn Spraсhе. Maanhеim − Lеipzig− Wiеn − Züriсh: Dudеnvеrlag, 1993.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing