|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
|
|
Defining Pronouns “һәр” and “each” as markers of distributivity in Tatar and English
|
Liliia Khabirovna Gabitova
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
|
|
Submitted:
April 29, 2026
|
|
Abstract.
The study aims to identify common and specific features of expressing distributivity using the defining pronouns “each” and “һәр” in the English and Tatar languages. The article presents a comparative analysis of the semantics and functioning of these defining pronouns based on the specified languages. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that, for the first time, a comparative study of the distributive potential of these units was conducted using material from structurally different languages with the involvement of corpus data. Within the framework of the semantic analysis of the pronouns “һәр” and “each”, the main models of their functioning as markers of distributive meaning were identified and systematized. The results of the study establish that while sharing a basic function, these pronouns demonstrate significant differences in the grammatical formalization of distributivity. In the Tatar language, distributivity is expressed synthetically through the interaction of “һәр” with the case system and possessive affixes, whereas in English, “each” realizes distributive meaning primarily analytically, relying on prepositions and other contextual intensifiers. At the same time, universal quantitative-distributive models and verbs with distributive semantics are identified in both languages.
|
Key words and phrases:
дистрибутивность
определительные местоимения
татарский язык
английский язык
сопоставительная лингвистика
distributivity
defining pronouns
Tatar language
English language
comparative linguistics
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Ганиев Ф. А. Татарский язык: проблемы и исследования. Казань: Татарское книжное изд-во, 2000.
- Лутфуллина Г. Ф. Сопоставительный анализ средств выражения способов действия кратности во французском и татарском языках: дисс. … к. филол. н. Казань, 2004.
- Татарская грамматика: в 3 т. Изд-е 2-е, доп. / рук. проекта М. З. Закиев. Казань: Институт языка, литературы и истории, 2016. Т. 2. Морфология.
- Харисова Ч. М. Татарский язык. Казань: Татарское книжное изд-во, 2014.
- Champollion L. Distributivity in Formal Semantics // Annual Review of Linguistics. 2019. № 5.
- Champollion L. Parts of a Whole: Distributivity as a Bridge Between Aspect and Measurement. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 2017.
- Coppock E. Division vs. distributivity: Is per just like each? // Semantics and Linguistic Theory. 2022. № 1. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v1i0.5335
- Dotlacil J., Brasoveanu A. The representation and processing of distributivity and collectivity: ambiguity vs. underspecification // Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. 2021. № 6 (1).
- Glass L. The lexical and formal semantics of distributivity // Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. 2021. № 6 (1).
- Haslinger N., Hien A. N., Rosina E. E. A unified semantics for distributive and non-distributive universal quantifiers across languages // Nat Lang Linguist Theory. 2025. № 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-025-09673-5
- Schwarzschild R. Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity // Nat Lang Seman. 1993. № 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01256743
- Vries H. Two kinds of distributivity // Natural Language Semantics. 2017. № 25 (2).
|
|
