GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 7. Part 1. P. 69-72.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

ARTISTIC CINEMATIC DISCOURSE OF HISTORICAL GENRE IN SPACE OF SEMIOSPHERA

Zaichenko Svetlana Sergeevna
Chelyabinsk State University


Abstract. The author touches upon the question of artistic semiotics topicality, within which framework researches cinematic discourse, suggests the semiotic-synergistic interpretation of cinematic discourse and cinematic text, specifies the content of the notions "artistic film discourse" and "historical film", and pays special attention to the consideration of artistic cinematic discourse of historical genre as one of the components of semiotic space, on the basis of semiosphere conception developed by Yu. M. Lotman.
Key words and phrases: художественная семиотика, семиотико-синергетическая организация, кинодискурс, кинотекст, художественный кинодискурс исторического жанра, семиосфера, artistic semiotics, semiotic-synergetic organization, cinematic discourse, cinematic text, artistic cinema.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Agafonova N. A. Obshchaya teoriya kino i osnovy analiza fil'ma. Minsk: Tesei, 2008. 392 s.
  2. Bergan R. Kino: polnaya entsiklopediya. M.: Dorling Kindersli; Izd-vo Astrel'; Izd-vo AST, 2008. 512 s.
  3. Vernadskii V. I. Razmyshleniya naturalista. M.: Nauka, 1977. Kn. 2. 191 s.
  4. Kino: entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / gl. red. S. I. Yutkevich. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1986. 640 s.
  5. Kozlov L. K. Istoricheskii fil'm // Kino: entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1986. S. 156-157.
  6. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2000. 704 s.
  7. Nechai O. F., Ratnikov G. V. Osnovy kinoiskusstva. Mn.: Vysheishaya shkola, 1985. 368 s.
  8. Oliz'ko N. S. Matematicheskii metayazyk kak sredstvo organizatsii postmodernistskogo khudozhestvennogo diskursa Dzh. Barta // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2009. № 1 (3). S. 145-150.
  9. Oliz'ko N. S. Semiotiko-sinergeticheskaya interpretatsiya osobennostei realizatsii kategorii intertekstual'nosti i interdiskursivnosti v postmodernistskom khudozhestvennom diskurse: diss. … d. filol. n. Chelyabinsk, 2009. 343 s.
  10. Ratnikov G. V. Zhanrovaya priroda fil'ma. Minsk: Navuka i tekhnika, 1990. 181 s.
  11. Tul'chinskii G. L. Glubokaya semiotika // Proektivnyi filosofskii slovar': Novye terminy i ponyatiya. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2003. S. 74.
  12. Feshchenko V. V. O vneshnikh i vnutrennikh gorizontakh semiotiki // Kritika i semiotika. Novosibirsk: NGU, 2005. Vyp. 8. S. 6-43.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2021 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru