GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. є 9. Part 2. P. 184-186.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

SEMANTIC-FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OF TEXT ARGUMENTATIVE COMPONENTS (BY THE MATERIAL OF COURT DECISIONS)

Sushentsova Tat'yana Vyacheslavovna
Udmurt State University


Abstract. The article considers the features of organizing argumentative dialogue in the texts of court decisions. The research on the functional-semantic characteristics of argumentation nominative components in the texts of court decisions with regard to their frequency in the implementation at the stages of argumentative development is suggested. Argumentative analysis of court decisions allows presenting the genre specificity of these texts in a new perspective.
Key words and phrases: аргументативный диалог, номинативные компоненты аргументации, функциональна€ семантика, жанр, судебное решение, argumentative dialogue, nominative components of argumentation, functional semantics, genre, court decision.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Industrial'nyi raionnyi sud g. Izhevska (Udmurtskaya Respublika) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://industrialnyy. udm.sudrf.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2013).
  2. Irbitskii raionnyi sud Sverdlovskoi oblasti [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://irbitsky.svd.sudrf.ru/modules. php?name=information&id=556 (data obrashcheniya: 12.04.2013).
  3. Temkina V. L. Soderzhatel'naya sushchnost' otsenochnosti (na materiale angliiskoi leksiki): avtoref. disc. Е kand. filol. nauk. Odessa: Odesskii gos. un-t im. I. I. Mechnikova, 1984. 16 s.
  4. Crable R. E. Argumentation as Communication: raesoning with Receivers. Columbus (Ohio): A. Bell and Howell Company, 1976. 276 r.
  5. Eemeren F. H. van., Grootendorst R., Kruiger T. Handbook of Argumentation Theory: a Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies Ц Dordrecht: Foris, 1987. 333 p.
  6. Toulmin S. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1968. 264 p.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2021 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru