GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 1. Part 2. P. 156-161.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

M. A. BULGAKOV AND V. V. MAYAKOVSKY: CONFRONTATION OR INFLUENCE?

Pokotylo Mikhail Valer'evich
Rostov State Transport University


Abstract. In the article there is an attempt to consider the creative work of two great Russian writers of the second half of the XX th century from the position of establishing interaction and mutual influence. The author supposes that Bulgakov and Mayakovsky had a constructive dialogue, first of all, in satire works, though their political, social and esthetic views were different. These authors’ integral feature is deep reflection, which always accompanies carnival forms in artistic world. At the same time their different attitude towards revolution idea is qualified as a differential feature.
Key words and phrases: гротеск, жанровая контаминация, карнавализация, комизм, сатира, смеховая культура, grotesque, genre contamination, semiotic theory of carnival, comicalness, satire, risorial culture
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Barinova K. V. P'esy N. Erdmana v kontekste karnavalizovannoi sovetskoi dramaturgii 1920-kh godov: diss. … k. filol. n. Vladivostok, 2009. 221 s.
  2. Bakhtin M. M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul'tura srednevekov'ya i Renessansa. Rable i Gogol' (iskusstvo slova i narodnaya smekhovaya kul'tura) // Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochinenii: v 7-mi t. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2010. T. 4 (2). 752 s.
  3. Golovchiner V. E. V spore rozhdaetsya… (o vzaimodeistvii dramaturgicheskikh printsipov V. Mayakovskogo i M. Bulgakova) // Vestnik TGPU. 1999. Vyp. 6 (15). Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki (Filologiya). S. 41-48.
  4. Zhiganets F. Mayakovskii i futuristy v "Mastere i Margarite" [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.proza.ru/ 2010/08/01/480 (data obrashcheniya: 13.10.2013).
  5. Ibatullina G. M. O konstruktivnykh parametrakh zhanrovykh modelei // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 12 (30): v 2-kh ch. Ch. I. C. 89-92.
  6. Likhachev D. S., Panchenko A. M., Ponyrko N. V. Smekh v Drevnei Rusi. L.: Nauka, 1984. 295 s.
  7. Petrovskii M. Dva mastera. Vladimir Mayakovskii i Mikhail Bulgakov // Literaturnoe obozrenie. 1987. № 6. S. 30-37.
  8. Stepanov N. Satira M. Bulgakova v kontekste russkoi satiry KhІKh – I poloviny KhKh vekov. Vinnitsa: Universum-Vinnitsa, 1999. 281 s.
  9. Freidenberg O. M. Mif i teatr. M.: GITIS, 1988. 132 s.
  10. Cherkashina M. Smert' "krikogubogo Zaratustry". Versiya gibeli Mayakovskogo v prelomlenii bulgakovskogo romana [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.rg.ru/Bulgakov/2.htm (data obrashcheniya: 25.09.2013).
  11. Yablokov E. Oni soshlis' (Mikhail Bulgakov i Vladimir Mayakovskii) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://eajablokov.ru/ article9.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.10.2013).
  12. Yanovskaya L. Zapiski o Mikhaile Bulgakove. M.: Tekst, 2007. 413 s.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru