GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 10. Part 1. P. 87-89.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

ROLE OF SUBJECT IN DISCOURSE OF DISSENTING OPINION

Krapivkina Ol'ga Aleksandrovna
National Research Irkutsk State Technical University


Abstract. The article analyzes the role of the subject in the discourse of dissenting opinion, which the author considers as an independent legal genre. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the author’s individual nature of the genre, the subject of which is free to choose the language means of discourse creation. The author argues that the institution of dissenting opinion is an instrument of judicial practice, which allows the judge, who does not agree with the collegial decision, to express his position on the merits.
Key words and phrases: особое мнение судьи, особое мнение согласия, особое мнение несогласия, жанр, субъект, дискурс, dissenting opinion, dissenting opinion of consent, dissenting opinion of dissent, genre, subject, discourse.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 s.
  2. Kononov A. L. Pravo na osoboe mnenie [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://refoteka.ru/r-95022.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2015).
  3. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 31 iyulya 1995 g. № 10-P (Osoboe mnenie sud'i Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii V. O. Luchina) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.alppp.ru/law/konstitucionnyj-stroj/prezident---glava-gosudarstva/2/postanovlenie-konstitucionnogo-suda-rf-ot-31-07-1995--10-p.html (data obrashcheniya: 14.02.2015).
  4. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 21 dekabrya 2005 goda № 13-P (Osoboe mnenie sud'i Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii V. G. Yaroslavtseva) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://docs. cntd.ru/document/901961721 (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2015).
  5. Ulturgashev P. Yu. Osoboe mnenie sud'i Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii: nekotorye aspekty regulirovaniya // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2011. № 4. S. 19-22.
  6. Shevyrdyaeva L. N. Yazyk sovremennogo amerikanskogo sudebnogo diskursa (na materiale reshenii Verkhovnogo Suda SShA): avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2010. 25 s.
  7. Lochner v. New York (1905) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.enotes.com/topics/lochner-v-new-york-131465 (data obrashcheniya: 13.02.2015).
  8. Justice Scalia's Dissent in Lawrence vs. Texas [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles2/ ScaliaLawrenceDissent.php (data obrashcheniya: 16.02.2015)

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2021 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru