GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. є 12. Part 1. P. 204-207.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

MAIN COMMUNICATIVE STRATEGIES IN THE BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY DISCOURSE OF DEBATES

Shiryaeva Tat'yana Aleksandrovna, Chernousova Yuliana Anatol'evna, Trius Liliya Ivanovna
Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University


Abstract. The article examines the main communicative strategies of the British parliamentary discourse of debates. The authors emphasize the considerable manipulative capability of the genre of the parliamentary discourse of debates and its orientation towards the search for the effective ways of linguistic influence on mass consciousness. The paper sets a task to identify and describe the main communicative strategies and language tactics implementing them used in the genre of the British parliamentary discourse "Debates". According to the institutional-specific objectives of the parliamentary discourse, in the context of the speakerТs achievement of the planned impact on the audience in compliance with his specific communicative intention, the main strategies of the British parliamentary discourse of debates are the strategies of presentation (self-presentation), appeal to and discredit to the opponent. These strategies are actualized in the speakerТs speech through a set of use of an institutional communicative ritual with the help of a specific set of language means, techniques making statements expressive and emotional, rhetorical and polemical techniques.
Key words and phrases: парламентский дискурс, лингвопрагматика, дискурс дебатов, коммуникативные стратегии, €зыковое воздействие, коммуникативный ритуал, социальные конвенции, parliamentary discourse, linguistic pragmatics, discourse of debates, communicative strategies, linguistic impact, communicative ritual, social conventions.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsii (kognitivnyi podkhod): avtoref. diss. Е d. filol. n. M., 1990. 48 s.
  2. Voloshina N. V. Debaty kak rechevoi zhanr v professional'noi deyatel'nosti uchitelya: diss. Е k. filol. n. M., 2006. 180 s.
  3. Datsyuk S. G. Kommunikativnye strategii [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2006/2751 (data obrashcheniya: 25.08.2015).
  4. Deik T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya. M.: Progress, 1989. 174 s.
  5. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoi rechi: monografiya. Omsk: Omskii gos. un-t, 1999. 285 s.
  6. Kalinin K. E. Kommunikativnye strategii ubezhdeniya v angloyazychnom politicheskom diskurse: avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2009. 21 s.
  7. Kosovtseva A. V. Diskurs britanskikh parlamentskikh debatov, ego sistemoobrazuyushchie priznaki // Lingua Mobilis. 2012. є 4 (37). S. 82-88.
  8. Koshkarova N. N. Prostranstvo konfliktnogo diskursa v zhanre politicheskogo interv'yu // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. 2010. є 17 (198). Vyp. 44. S. 54-59.
  9. Leont'ev A. N. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya // Vygotskii L. S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6-ti t. M.: Pedagogika, 1982. T. 1. S. 5-13.
  10. Ruchkina E. M. Vzaimodeistvie kommunikativnykh strategii i strategii vezhlivosti v argumentativnom dialoge // Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2008. Vyp. 4. S. 236-241.
  11. Saprykina E. V. Sposoby reprezentatsii rechevogo deistviya "obvinenie" v parlamentskom diskurse: na materiale parlamentskikh debatov bundestaga FRG: avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. Ufa, 2007. 19 s.
  12. Sakharnyi JI. V. Vvedenie v psikholingvistiku: kurs lektsii. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1989. 180 s.
  13. Khabermas Yu. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deistvie. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. 390 s.
  14. Shiryaeva T. A., Trius L. I. Pragmaticheskii potentsial parlamentskikh zhanrov (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2014. є 4. S. 100-103.
  15. Shiryaeva T. A., Chernousova Yu. A. Pragma-ritoricheskaya perspektiva issledovaniya angloyazychnogo parlamentskogo diskursa // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. є 1 (43). S. 211-217.
  16. Epshtein O. V. Semantiko-pragmaticheskie i kommunikativno-funktsional'nye kategorii politicheskogo diskursa // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2008. є 2. S. 150-156.
  17. Brown P. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987. 345 p.
  18. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmgeneral/euro/150129/150129s01.htm (data obrashcheniya: 18.08.2015).

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2020 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru