GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 7. Part 3. P. 180-184.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

DISCREDITING STRATEGY IN THE DISCOURSE OF MODERN BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES

Shiryaeva Tat'yana Aleksandrovna, Chernousova Yuliana Anatol'evna, Trius Liliya Ivanovna
Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University


Abstract. The article examines the discrediting strategy as one of the basic communicative strategies of the British parliamentary discourse of debates. The authors focus attention on the importance of studying this strategy that shapes the mass audience’s idea about politicians and governmental institutions. The main speech tactics realizing the discrediting strategy: opposition, negative public image making, exposure, oblique accusation, identification, reproach, irony, based on the use of a wide range of linguistic and stylistic means, are identified and analyzed in the paper. The use of this strategy contributes to the effective interaction of communicants, allows the speaker to achieve a required planned effect on the audience, and minimizes appearing parliamentary conflicts, which have a negative impact on the political, social and economic situation in the country.
Key words and phrases: коммуникативная интенция, коммуникативная стратегия, речевая тактика, языковой маркер, парламентский дискурс, парламентские дебаты, стратегия дискредитации, communicative intention, communicative strategy, speech tactics, language marker, parliamentary discourse, parliamentary debates, discrediting strategy.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Ankudinova E. I. Manipulyativnyi potentsial strategii diskreditatsii (na primere radioobrashchenii R. Limbo) // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. № 17 (232). S. 23-26.
  2. At'man O. V. Verbalizatsiya strategii samoprezentatsii v prezidentskikh predvybornykh teledebatakh kak agonal'nom zhanre politicheskogo diskursa SShA // Politicheskaya lingvistika. 2011. № 1 (35). S. 96-101.
  3. Gromyko S. A. Rechevaya strategiya diskreditatsii v russkoi parlamentskoi diskussii nachala KhKh veka // Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. T. 2. № 3. S. 97-100.
  4. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoi rechi. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 288 s.
  5. Kalinin K. E. Kommunikativnye strategii ubezhdeniya v angloyazychnom politicheskom diskurse: avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2009. 21 s.
  6. Klushina N. I. Intentsional'nyi metod v sovremennoi lingvisticheskoi paradigme [Elektronnyi resurs] // Mediaskop: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal fakul'teta zhurnalistiki MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. 2012. Vyp. № 4. URL: http://www.mediascope.ru/node/1242 (data obrashcheniya: 15.04.2016).
  7. Kryachkova A. P. Realizatsiya strategii diskreditatsii opponenta v politicheskikh debatakh nemetskogo Bundestaga // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 10-1 (52). S. 89-92.
  8. Nikiforova M. V. Strategiya diskreditatsii v diskurse regional'nogo politika (na materiale rechei mera Ekaterinburga E. Roizmana) // Politicheskaya lingvistika. 2015. № 4 (54). S. 101-105.
  9. Parshina O. N. Strategii i taktiki rechevogo povedeniya sovremennoi politicheskoi elity Rossii: diss. … d. filol. n. Saratov, 2006. 325 c.
  10. Shiryaeva T. A., Chernousova Yu. A. Pragma-ritoricheskaya perspektiva issledovaniya angloyazychnogo parlamentskogo diskursa // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 1 (43). S. 211-217.
  11. Shiryaeva T. A., Chernousova Yu. A., Trius L. I. Osnovnye kommunikativnye strategii v britanskom parlamentskom diskurse debatov // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 12-1 (54). S. 204-207.
  12. Brussels Terrorist Attacks [Elektronnyi resurs] // House of Commons Hansard. URL: https://hansard.parliament.uk/ Commons/2016-03-23/debates/16032339000003/BrusselsTerroristAttacks (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2016).
  13. Brussels Terrorist Attacks [Elektronnyi resurs] // House of Lords Hansard. URL: https://hansard.parliament.uk/ Lords/2016-03-23/debates/16032356000445/BrusselsTerroristAttacks (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2016).
  14. European Union: Refugees [Elektronnyi resurs] // House of Lords Hansard. URL: https://hansard. parliament.uk/Lords/ 2016-03-01/debates/16030157000314/EuropeanUnionRefugees?highlight=European%20Union%20Refugees#contribution-16030157000106 (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2016).
  15. Refugees [Elektronnyi resurs] // House of Commons Hansard. URL: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-04-11/ debates/1604111000011/Refugees (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2016).
  16. Refugees: Deaths in Mediterranean and Aegean Seas [Elektronnyi resurs] // House of Lords Hansard. URL: https://hansard. parliament.uk/Lords/2016-04-11/debates/1604115001375/RefugeesDeathsInMediterraneanAndAegeanSeas (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2016).

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2021 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru