GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 11. Part 2. P. 89-92.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

DIALOGICAL MEANS AS A WAY OF PERSUASION (IN TEXTS OF WEB PAGES OF TOUR OPERATORS)

Kolchevskaya Valeriya Alekseevna
Kuban State University


Abstract. The article deals with persuasion methods used by tour operators in the texts of web pages. Definitions of key terms of persuasion are given, as well as of dialogical nature and concomitant terms relating to means of persuasion. The means of dialogical nature are presented, by means of which the authors of tourist discourse texts influence the behaviour of the addressee in such a way that he would perform certain actions, namely with the aim of acquiring tourist services. Examples of other discourses, different from the tourist one, are given in which the authors of the texts use the means of dialogical nature with the aim of influencing the addressee. Conclusions are made about the means of dialogical nature as a method of persuasion. Examples from the research corpus, confirming the conclusions, are illustrated.
Key words and phrases: убеждение, диалогичность, средства диалогичности, туристический дискурс, языковые средства, persuasion, dialogical nature, dialogical means, tourist discourse, language means
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Bakhtin M. M. Avtor i geroi. K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb.: Azbuka, 2000. 336 s.
  2. Gaibova M. T. Pragmalingvisticheskii analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta. Baku: AGU, 1986. 88 s.
  3. Dashkova S. Yu. Ritoricheskii vopros v strukture argumentativnogo vyskazyvaniya (v nauchno-uchebnom tekste) // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2013. T. 2. № 2 (54). S. 36-40.
  4. Derenich E. G. Imperativnye predlozheniya v rusle kognitivnoi grammatiki (na materiale angliiskoi i amerikanskoi khudozhestvennoi prozy): diss. … k. filol. n. Vladivostok, 2003. 167 s.
  5. Zevakhina N. A. Sintaksis vosklitsatel'nykh konstruktsii: diss.. k. filol. n. M., 2012. 312 s.
  6. Karamova A. A., Silant'eva V. M. Ritoricheskii vopros i ritoricheskoe vosklitsanie v sovremennom politicheskom diskurse // Innovatsionnaya nauka. Ufa, 2016. № 3. Ch. 3. S. 168-170.
  7. Karasik V. I. O tipakh diskursa // Yazykovaya lichnost': institutsional'nyi i personal'nyi diskurs: sb. nauch. tr. Volgograd: Peremena, 2000. S. 5-20.
  8. Kormilitsyna M. A. Zabota ob adresate - vazhneishaya funktsiya rechevogo etiketa v sovremennoi gazete // Voprosy kul'tury rechi. M., 2011. T. 10. S. 353-357.
  9. Mishlanov V. A., Salimovskii V. A. Dialogichnost' tserkovno-religioznykh tekstov // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya. 2010. Vyp. 6 (12). S. 24-29.
  10. Pogodaeva S. A. Yazykovye sredstva argumentatsii vo frantsuzskom turisticheskom diskurse: diss. … k. filol. n. Irkutsk, 2008. 234 s.
  11. Ritoricheskii vopros [Elektronnyi resurs] // Literaturnaya entsiklopediya: v 11-ti t. / pod red. V. M. Friche, A. V. Lunacharskogo. M.: Izd-vo Kommunisticheskoi akademii; Sovetskaya entsiklopediya; Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1929-1939. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_literature/4001/Ritoricheskii (data obrashcheniya: 09.10.2017).
  12. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka / pod red. D. V. Dmitrieva. M.: Astrel'; AST, 2003. 1578 s.
  13. Filatova N. V. Zhanrovoe prostranstvo turisticheskogo diskursa // Rhema. Rema. M.: Moskovskii pedagogicheskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2012. № 2. S. 76-82.
  14. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / red.-sost. E. F. Gubskii i dr. M.: INFRA-M, 2009. 576 s.
  15. Khutyz I. P. Akademicheskii diskurs: kul'turno-spetsificheskaya sistema konstruirovaniya i translyatsii znanii. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2015. 176 s.
  16. Chernyavskaya V. E. Interpretatsiya nauchnogo teksta. 5-e izd-e. M.: URSS, 2010. 128 s.
  17. Fey T. Bossypants. N. Y., 2011. 277 p.
  18. https://www.tez-tour.com/ru/krasnodar/news.html?id=7025535 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2017).
  19. https://www.tez-tour.com/ru/krasnodar/restType.html?id=20 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2017).
  20. https://www.tez-tour.com/ru/krasnodar/restType.html?id=21 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2017).
  21. https://www.tez-tour.com/ru/krasnodar/restType.html?id=24 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2017).
  22. http://www.more-turov.com/hot-tours (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2017).
  23. http://www.travelata.ru/rating (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2017).
  24. Hyland K. Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse // Discourse Studies. 2005. Vol. 7 (2). P. 173-192.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru