GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 12. Part 2. P. 147-150.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

SPECIFICITY OF ANTI-EFFECT SYNTACTIC FIELD IN THE MODERN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE

Starodubtseva Zinaida Grigor'evna, Intymakova Larisa Grigor'evna, Dudnikova Elena Evgen'evna
Rostov State University of Economics


Abstract. The article considers the mechanism to form the meaning of non-correspondence on which the description of anti-effect syntactic field is based. The paper tries to identify the functional value of an anti-effect phenomenon when studying linguistic facts. The authors propose a new approach to interpreting syntactic structures, considering the fact that the systems of syntactic constructions are identified not only according to certain syntactic features but also taking into account the representation of a unified objective content which comes out as a typical meaning.
Key words and phrases: антиследствие, микрополе, антиследственные отношения, антилогизм, синтаксическое поле антиследствия, преодолевающий компонент, преодолеваемый компонент, anti-effect, micro-field, anti-effect relations, anti-logism, anti-effect syntactic field, overcoming component, surmounted component
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Velichko A. A. Teoriya polya kak printsip organizatsii i metod opisaniya semantiki tsvetooboznachenii // Al'manakh sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya. 2010. № 2 (33): v 2-kh ch. Ch. 2. S. 46-49.
  2. Veresaev V. V. Istoriya odnogo romana "Genii chistoi krasoty", 1825 // Smena. 1995. № 3. S. 138-148.
  3. Veresaev V. V. Sputniki Pushkina: v 2-kh t. M.: Lokid-Press, 2001. T. 1. 447 s.
  4. Veresaev V. V. Sputniki Pushkina: v 2-kh t. M.: Lokid-Press, 2001. T. 2. 607 s.
  5. Gak V. G. K probleme sintaksicheskoi semantiki // Invariantnye sintaksicheskie znacheniya i struktura predlozheniya. M.: Nauka, 1969. S. 77-85.
  6. Griboedov A. S. Gore ot uma: komediya v chetyrekh deistviyakh i stikhakh. M.: Sov. Rossiya, 1989. 192 s.
  7. Zolotova G. A. Ocherk funktsional'nogo sintaksisa russkogo yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1973. 349 s.
  8. Kadyrova G. R. Teoreticheskie podkhody k ponyatiyu "polya" v lingvistike // Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanii. 2014. № 12. Ch. 2. S. 237-241.
  9. Krivonosov A. T. Estestvennyi yazyk i logika. M. - N'yu-Iork: Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi lingvisticheskii universitet, 1993. 318 s.
  10. Krivonosov A. T. Yazyk. Logika. Myshlenie. Umozaklyuchenie v estestvennom yazyke. M. - N'yu-Iork: Valang, 1996. 684 s.
  11. Polyakova G. M. Analiz leksiko-semanticheskogo polya "Odezhda" v russkom, angliiskom i nemetskom yazykakh v aspekte sopostavitel'noi lingvokul'turologii: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2012. 17 c.
  12. Starodubtseva Z. G. Antisledstvie kak sredstvo formirovaniya komicheskogo effekta v rechi personazha // Mirovye innovatsionnye proryvy: sb. materialov mezhdunar. nauchno-prakt. konf. (g. Sankt- Peterburg, 31 maya 2017 g.): v 2-kh ch. SPb. - Irkutsk: Nauchnoe partnerstvo "Apeks", 2017. Ch. 1. S. 92-94.
  13. Starodubtseva Z. G. Ob odnom original'nom podkhode k interpretatsii khudozhestvennogo teksta // Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya nauki i tekhnologii: po materialam KhKhIII mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf.: periodicheskii nauchnyi sbornik (g. Belgorod, APNI, 28 fevralya 2017 g.). 2017. № 2. Ch. 5. S. 95-98.
  14. Tolstoi L. N. Anna Karenina: roman: v 8-mi ch. M.: Khudozh. lit, 1981. 799 s.
  15. Tolstoi L. N. Voina i mir: roman: v 4-kh t. M.: Eksmo, 2002. T. 1-2. 736 s.
  16. Tyutchev F. I. "Ya vstretil Vas…". Povest' G. V. Chagina o zhizni i tvorchestve F. I. Tyutcheva i izbrannye stikhotvoreniya poeta. M.: Det. lit., 2003. 208 s.
  17. Ufimtseva A. A. Leksicheskoe znachenie: printsip semiologicheskogo opisaniya leksiki / pod red. Yu. S. Stepanova. Izd. 2-e, ispr. M.: URSS, 2002. 240 s.
  18. Khomskii N. Yazyk i myshlenie. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1972. 123 s.
  19. Chesnokov P. V. Grammatika russkogo yazyka v svete teorii semanticheskikh form myshleniya. Taganrog: Izd-vo Taganrog. gos. ped. in-ta, 1992. 166 s.
  20. Chesnokov P. V. Logicheskie i semanticheskie formy myshleniya kak znacheniya grammaticheskikh form // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1984. № 5. S. 3-13.
  21. Shchur G. S. Teorii polya v lingvistike. M.: Nauka, 1974. 256 s.
  22. Eko U. Nauka, tekhnologiya i magiya // Nauka i religiya. 2008. № 8. S. 6- 7.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru