GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2020. № 6. P. 230-233.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.6.43

Incomplete Reply as Part of Evasion Strategy: Analysis of Focus Elements in Speech

Isaeva Snezhana Nikolaevna
Moscow State Linguistic University


Submitted: 21.02.2020.
Abstract. The article studies cognitive, pragmatic and linguistic features of incomplete replies as a part of the communicative strategy of evasion by the material of television talk-show programmes. The work aims to study ways in which incomplete replies function in a question-and-answer speech complex from the perspective of (de)focusing cognitive mechanisms underlying the evasion strategy, which has determined novelty of the research. As a result of the carried-out analysis, the mechanisms most frequently employed in incomplete replies are discovered, the most common lexical and stylistic means of realising these mechanisms are determined.
Key words and phrases: стратегия уклонения, уклонение, неполный ответ, когнитивные механизмы, (де)фокусирование, evasion strategy, evasion, incomplete reply, cognitive mechanisms, (de)focusing.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Gnezdilova L. B. Kommunikativnye sredstva vyrazheniya strategii ukloneniya ot pryamogo otveta. Novosibirsk: TsRNS, 2012. 110 s.
  2. Iriskhanova O. K. Igry fokusa v yazyke. Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2014. 320 s.
  3. Parshina O. N. Taktiki i priemy manipulirovaniya v rechevom povedenii rossiiskikh politikov // Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2004. № 3 (22). S. 291-296.
  4. Popchuk O. M. Lingvisticheskie i paralingvisticheskie sredstva realizatsii lozhnogo vyskazyvaniya v akte kommunikatsii: diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2006. 252 s.
  5. Stel'mashuk A. Dialogizatsiya i sposoby ee realizatsii v razlichnykh rechevykh sferakh sovremennogo russkogo yazyka (khudozhestvennaya i nauchnaya proza): avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. SPb., 1993. 34 s.
  6. Bradac J. The language of lovers, flowers and friends: Communicating in social and personal relationships // Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1983. № 2. P. 141-162.
  7. Bull P. On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews // Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1994. № 13. P. 115-131.
  8. Bull P., Mayer K. How not to answer questions in political interviews // Political Psychology. 1993. № 14. P. 651-666.
  9. Dillon J. T. The practice of questioning. L.: Routledge, 1990. 287 r.
  10. Galasinski D. The Language of Deception: A Discourse Analytical Study. California: SAGE Publications, 2000. 155 p.
  11. Harris S. Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews // Broadcast Talk / ed. by P. Scannell. L.: Sage, 1991. P. 76-99.
  12. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFx53EQdqw4 (data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2019).
  13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0c3wvV8g6o (data obrashcheniya: 15.08.2019).
  14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdHPZsHE6nE&t=1s (data obrashcheniya: 21.07.2019).
  15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ8db9C9OAc (data obrashcheniya: 17.08.2019).
  16. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0a68Gzv52k&t=3s (data obrashcheniya: 15.08.2019).
  17. Partington A. The Linguistics of Political Argument. L. - N. Y.: Routledge, 2003. 289 p.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2021 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru