GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2020. № 6. P. 55-70.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.6.9

Dickens’s Outline in Dostoevsky’s Novel
Priima Ivan Fedorovich
Institute of the Russian Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Submitted: 13.05.2020
Abstract. The article aims at finding new parallels between Charles Dickens’s "Bleak House" and Fyodor Dostoevsky’s "The Brothers Karamazov". After a thorough research of literature on the issue, the author, analysing the texts in a completely new way, finds much in common between the two novels: from certain characters to the basic plot construction. The obtained results show it was widespread European archetypes that Dostoevsky borrowed from Dickens. "The Brothers Karamazov’s" philosophical foundation is unique: the figure of Grand Inquisitor becomes a centre of a "wider plot" - the one the English novel does not have. The theory of declining aristocracy with its "dandyism" opposed to ordinary people’s values cannot be admitted a part of Dickens’s influence for Dostoevsky came to a similar theory before him.
Key words and phrases: Достоевский, Диккенс, "Холодный дом", "Братья Карамазовы", Великий Инквизитор, дендизм, Dostoevsky, Dickens, "Bleak House", "The Brothers Karamazov", Grand Inquisitor, dandyism
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Apostol Pavel. Poslanie k Efesyanam // Bibliya. Knigi Svyashchennogo Pisaniya Vetkhogo i Novogo Zaveta kanonicheskie. L.: Print, 1990. T. 2. S. 560-563.
  2. Biblioteka F. M. Dostoevskogo. Opyt rekonstruktsii. Nauchnoe opisanie / pod red. N. F. Budanovoi. SPb.: Nauka, 2005. 338 s.
  3. Dikkens Ch. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30-ti t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1957-1963. T. 17. 564 s.; T. 18. 580 s.
  4. Dostoevskii F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1972-1990. T. 8. 511 s.; T. 10. 519 s.; T. 14. 511 s.; T. 15. 623 s.; T. 18. 371 s.; T. 21. 551 s.; T. 25. 472 s.; T. 26. 518 s.; T. 27. 463 s.; T. 28 (II). 616 s.; T. 30 (I). 456 s.
  5. Katarskii I. M. Dikkens v Rossii. Seredina XIX veka. M.: Nauka, 1966. 428 s.
  6. Katarskii I. M. Dostoevskii i Dikkens (1860-1870-e gody) // Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniya. L.: Nauka, 1976. T. 2. S. 277-284.
  7. Popoviћ Ј. Sp. Dostoјevski o Evropi i Slovenstvu. Beograd: Prosveta (izdaјe Manastir Ћeliјe), 1981. 368 s.
  8. Popoviћ Ј. Sp. Filosofiјa i religiјa F. M. Dostoјevskoga. Sremski Karlovtsi, 1923. 195 s.
  9. Priima I. F. O nasledii Alekseya Stepanovicha Khomyakova (k kontseptsii B. F. Egorova) // Slavistika. Slavic Studies. 2019. Kњ. XXIII. Sv. 2. S. 156-180.
  10. Priima I. F. Slavyanskaya ideya v "Dnevnike pisatelya" F. M. Dostoevskogo. SPb.: Beresta, 2020. 336 s.
  11. Priima I. F. "Slavyanskaya ideya" F. M. Dostoevskogo i slavyanofil'skaya lirika 1830-1850 gg. // Istoriya i kul'tura. 2013. Vyp. 11. S. 31-80.
  12. Reizov B. G. K voprosu o vliyanii Dikkensa na Dostoevskogo // Yazyk i literatura. 1930. T. 5. S. 253-270.
  13. Reizov B. G. O zapadnom vliyanii v tvorchestve Dostoevskogo // Izvestiya Severo-Kavkazskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 1927. T. 1. S. 95-104.
  14. Reizov B. G. "Unizhennye i oskorblennye" F. M. Dostoevskogo i problemy zarubezhnoi literatury // Russkaya literatura. 1972. № 2. S. 62-76.
  15. Sil'man T. I. Dikkens: ocherki tvorchestva. L.: Khudozh. literatura, 1970. 376 s.
  16. Toper V. Iz arkhiva redaktora. Retsenziya na perevod romana Ch. Dikkensa "Kholodnyi dom" // Masterstvo perevoda - 1966. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1968. S. 337-362.
  17. Fridlender G. M. Romany Dostoevskogo // Istoriya russkogo romana: v 2-kh t. M. - L.: Nauka, 1964. T. 2. S. 193-269.
  18. Chances E. [Review:] MacPike, Loralee. Dostoevsky’s Dickens: A study of literary influence // Slavic Review. 1982. Vol. 41. Iss. 3. P. 575-576.
  19. Fanger D. Dostoevsky and romantic realism. A study of Dostoevsky in relation to Balzak, Dickens and Gogol. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965. 307 r.
  20. Grivec F. Fjodor M. Dostojevskij in Vladimir Solovjev // Bogoslovni vestnik. Ljubljana, 1931. Zvezek II/III. S. 97-142.
  21. Lary N. M. Dostoevsky and Dickens. A study of literary influence. L. -Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973. 172 p.
  22. MacPike L. Dostoevsky’s Dickens: A study of literary influence. Totowa, N. J.: Barnes & Noble Books, 1981. 223 p.
  23. Wilson A. Dickens and Dostoevsky // Dickens memorial lectures: Kathleen Tillotson, Sylvere Monod, Angus Wilson. L., 1970. P. 41-60.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru