GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2012. № 2. Part 1. P. 69-71.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Law Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

MOST FAVOURED NATION IMPLEMENTATION GENESIS IN INTERNATIONAL TREATIES

Gun'ko Ol'ga Evgen'evna
Baltic Federal University named after Kant


Abstract. The author considers the changes of the most favoured nation (MFN) functions applied to foreign investments during various historical periods ranging from the XIth century till the middle of the XXth century; and reveals the distinct dependence of the MFN clauses implementation assignment on the dominant foreign economic policy of states.
Key words and phrases: оговорка о режиме наибольшего благоприятствования, генезис института режима наибольшего благоприятствования, безусловный режим наибольшего благоприятствования, условный режим наибольшего благоприятствования, most favoured nation clause, most favoured nation institution genesis, unconditional most favoured nation, conditional most favoured nation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Labin D. K. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie investitsionnykh otnoshenii: istoricheskii ocherk // Pravo i politika. 2000. № 9.
  2. Barnhart M. Japan Prepares for Total War. The Search for Economic Security 1919-1941. Ithaca - London, 1987.
  3. Brandt H. Die Durchbrechung der Meistbegunstigung. Berlin: Heymann, 1933.
  4. Hirschmann A. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley, 1945.
  5. Hock H. Was hat man mit der Meistbegunstigung gewollt? B., 1931.
  6. Hornbeck S. The Most-Favored-Nation Clause // Am. J. Int'l L. 1909. Vol. 3.
  7. Lillich R. The International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Alien. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1983. Vol. V.
  8. Luedicke H. Die Entwicklung des Meistbegunstigungsprinzips: Versuch der theoretischen Behandlung der Meistbegunstigungsfrage. B., 1925.
  9. Lusensky F. Unbeschrankte gegen beschrankte Meistbegunstigung (Reziprozitat). Wien, 1918.
  10. Malloy W. I. Treaties, Conventions, International Acts, Protocols and Agreements between the United States of America and Other Powers: 1776-1909. N. Y., 1910.
  11. Schill S. Der Einfluss der Wettbewerbsideologie des Nationalsozialismus auf den Schutzzweck des UWG. B., 2004.
  12. Schill S. Multilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses // Berkeley J. Int'l L. 2009. Vol. 27.
  13. Schwartz G., Warren F., Sykes A. The Economics of the Most Favored Nation Clause // Economic Dimensions in International Law. N. Y., 1997.
  14. Schwarzenberger G. Foreign Investment and International Law. L.: Stevens & Sons, 1969.
  15. Snyder R. The Most-Favored-Nation Clause. N. Y.: King's Crown Press, 1948.
  16. Sommer L. Die Voraussetzungen des staatsideologischen Kampfes gegen die Meistbegunstigungsklausel // Zeitschrift fur offentliches Recht. 1936. № 2.
  17. Ustor E. First Report on the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause // Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n. 1969. Vol. 2. A/SN. 4/213.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru