Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 12. Part 5. P. 25-27.
THE CONTRADICTIONS INHERENT IN THE IDEA OF GENERAL VALIDITY OF REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT
Bagratuni Nikita Dmitrievich
Saint-Petersburg State University in Economics
Abstract. The article reveals the significance of the liar paradox through the prism of reflective judgment. Ethical and epistemological grounds for a well-known ancient formula are revealed. The abilities to identify and predict are assumed by the methodological framework of reflection, which makes it possible to claim a general validity. So, with the help of the notion of the liar paradox and two forms of common sense, the author states a new rationale for the connection between the Cartesian Cogito and the Kantian judgment ability.
Key words and phrases: здравый смысл, рефлексивное суждение, иллюзия, общезначимость, парадокс лжеца, common sense, reflective judgment, illusion, general validity, liar paradox
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bergson A. Zdravyi smysl i klassicheskoe obrazovanie // Voprosy filosofii. 1990. № 1. S. 163-168.
Vitgenshtein L. Logiko-filosofskii traktat // Vitgenshtein L. Filosofskie raboty. M.: Gnozis, 1994. Ch. 1. S. 22-165.
Dekart R. Rassuzhdenie o metode. M.: Filosofskie tekhnologii, 2014. 335 s.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. M.: Raritet, 1998. 480 s.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. SPb.: Nauka, Leningradskoe otdelenie, 2009. 512 s.
Mamardashvili M. Vstrecha s Dekartom. M.: Ad Marginem, 1996. 440 s.
Русский
