GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 9. P. 99-102.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

WHAT "CENTRISM" IS TOPICAL FOR "GOOD SOCIETY"?

Koval' Ekaterina Aleksandrovna
Middle Volga Institute (Branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia) in Saransk


Abstract. The article is devoted to the analysis of compatibility of such philosophical positions as anthropocentrism, biocentrism, eco-centrism and transhumanism with constitutive parameters of liberal and communitarian models of "good society". The author suggests that anthropocentrism and biocentrism are compatible with both types of "good societies", transhumanism more closely corresponds to parameters of "good society" of the liberal type, and eco-centrism - to the communitarian one. At the same time, the sign of attainability of "good society", being attributive, obliges to give preference to mild anthropocentrism as the leading worldview position in modern societies.
Key words and phrases: "хорошее общество", антропоцентризм, биоцентризм, экоцентризм, трансгуманизм, либерализм, коммунитаризм, "good society", anthropocentrism, biocentrism, eco-centrism, transhumanism, liberalism, communitarianism
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Bostrom N. FAQ po transgumanizmu [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://fanread.ru/book/14202857/?page=4 (data obrashcheniya: 05.03.2017).
  2. Konventsiya o zashchite prav i dostoinstva cheloveka v svyazi s primeneniem dostizhenii biologii i meditsiny (ETS N 164) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Dostup iz SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
  3. Kellikott B. Prirodookhrannye tsennosti i etika // Gumanitarnyi ekologicheskii zhurnal. 1999. T. 1. Vyp. 2. S. 40-67.
  4. Sazeeva I. B., Grosheva T. N. Antigumanisticheskii kharakter filosofii transgumanizma // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2017. № 3 (77): v 2-kh ch. Ch. 1. C. 122-126.
  5. Fedotova V. G. Khoroshee obshchestvo. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2005. 544 s.
  6. Shveitser A. Kul'tura i etika / per. s nem. N. A. Zakharchenko, G. V. Kolshanskogo; obshch. red. prof. V. A. Karpushina. M.: Progress, 1973. 343 s.
  7. Etzioni A. The Good Society // Seattle Journal of Social Justice. 2002. Vol. 1. Issue 1. P. 83-96.
  8. Galbraith J. K. The Good Society: The Humane Agenda. Boston - N. Y.: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1997. 160 p.
  9. Kenworthy L. Climate Stability [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://lanekenworthy.net/climate-stability/ (data obrashcheniya: 27.03.2017).
  10. Kenworthy L. The Good Society [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://lanekenworthy.net/thegoodsociety/ (data obrashcheniya: 27.03.2017).
  11. Lippmann W. An Inquiry into the Principles of the Good Society. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1938. 402 p.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2023 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru