GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Manuscript. Tambov: Gramota, 2019. № 9. P. 150-155.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2019.9.32

COMPLEXITY OF SPECIALIZED FORMS OF CULTURE AS A FACTOR FOR CULTURAL COMPLICATION

Opolev Pavel Valer'evich
Siberian State Automobile and Highway University (SibADI)


Submitted: 03.07.2019
Abstract. The article considers the problem of complexity in culture through the lenses of its specialized forms, identifies the patterns of culture complication. Progress in art is interpreted as one of the aspects of humanitarian progress. On the one hand, art objects are invaluable and unique; on the other hand, specialized forms of culture represent cultural complexity. Specialized forms of culture can be considered as a cause and consequence of cultural complication. The following criteria of art complication are identified: perfect performance technique, originality, meaningful fullness, "fractal narration", subjects’ ability for aesthetic reflection, etc. The author concludes that when it comes to complexity of specialized forms of culture, complexity should be considered as an anthropo-cultural phenomenon.
Key words and phrases: искусство, культура, прогресс, простота, сложность, усложнение, человек, фрактал, art, culture, progress, simplicity, complexity, complication, human being, fractal
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Belyi A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie. M.: Respublika, 1994. 528 s.
  2. Bibler V. S. Ot naukoucheniya - k logike kul'tury: dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat' pervyi vek. M.: Politizdat, 1990. 413 s.
  3. Bocharov S. G. O khudozhestvennykh mirakh. M.: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1985. 296 s.
  4. Zaichenko M. A. Fraktal'naya sovremennost' ili sovremennaya fraktal'nost'? // Karel'skii nauchnyi zhurnal. 2014. № 9. S. 13-15.
  5. Ivanov V. I. Dostoevskii i roman-tragediya // Ivanov V. I. Rodnoe i vselenskoe. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 282-312.
  6. Kroche B. Estetika kak nauka o vyrazhenii i kak obshchaya lingvistika. M., 1920. 171 s.
  7. Lipovetskii M. N. Mayatnik: ot "prostoty" k "slozhnosti" i obratno // Filologicheskii klass. 2012. № 2 (28). S. 5-10.
  8. Opolev P. V. Problemy kontseptualizatsii slozhnosti v nauke i filosofii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2019. № 48. S. 15-24.
  9. Raushenbakh B. V. Prostranstvennye postroeniya v zhivopisi. M.: Nauka, 1980. 288 s.
  10. Slastenin P. V. Kategoriya prostoty v sovremennoi arkhitekture // Gradostroitel'stvo i arkhitektura. 2011. № 3. S. 6-8.
  11. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy: ocherki morfologii mirovoi istorii: v 2-kh t. / per. s nem., vstup. st. i prim. K. A. Svas'yana. M.: Mysl', 1998. T. 1. Geshtal't i deistvitel'nost'. 663 s.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2023 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru