GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Manuscript. Tambov: Gramota, 2020. № 7. P. 89-96.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2020.7.16

Problems of Philosophical Interpretation of Complex Technical SMART-Systems

Ansari Mustafa, Kuzminov Alexander Nikolaevich, Paliy Irina Georgievna
Rostov State University of Economics


Submitted: 19.05.2020
Abstract. The research aims to identify specific features and cognition orientation of modern complex technical systems as a phenomenon integrating multiple entities: from economic and production ones to management systems, which necessitates integration of multiform patterns and properties into a single methodological framework. Scientific novelty of the study lies in using B. I. Kudrin’s technocenosis approach, which represents a brand new philosophical branch - philosophy of technetique - as the basic theory. The main idea of this approach can be based upon inextricable link and interdependence between machines, technologies, materials, consumer products, etc., in which every component is identified by a document and at the same time functions as an object of study and management, i.e. a peculiar kind of integrated technocenosis. The authors substantiate such integration by using the participative method, which makes it possible to link together various theoretical sources touching upon issues of philosophy of technology and philosophy of engineering. As a result of the study, the basic foundations of cognition of complex technical systems defining the need to use the cenosis theory for their description and design are offered.
Key words and phrases: философия техники, инженерия, сложные технические системы, техноценоз, проектирование, philosophy of technology, engineering, complex technical systems, technocenosis, designing
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Azarova Yu. O. "Phronesis" Aristotelya i "Differend" Liotara // Verbum. 2017. № 19. S. 220-226.
  2. Brendl D. "Umnoe" proizvodstvo: konvergentsiya razlichnykh sostavlyayushchikh [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://controleng.ru/ wp-content/uploads/6626.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2020).
  3. Bushueva V. V., Bushuev N. N. Znachenie protivorechii v tekhnicheskom tvorchestve // Gumanitarnyi vestnik. 2018. № 11 (73). S. 1-10.
  4. Kudrin B. I. Tekhnetika: novaya paradigma filosofii tekhniki (tret'ya nauchnaya kartina mira). Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 1998. 40 s.
  5. Kudrin B. I. Cherez ternii k obshchei i prikladnoi tsenologii // Osnovy tsenologii, tekhnetiki, elektriki. Antologiya publikatsii i interv'yu za 2016-1980 gg.: monografiya. M.: Tekhnetika, 2016. Vyp. 57/30. Tsenologicheskie issledovaniya. 550 s.
  6. Kuz'minov A. N. Tsenologicheskii ekspertnyi analiz v sisteme SMART-upravleniya predpriyatiem // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki. 2018. № 6. S. 166-168.
  7. Kuz'minov A. N., Palii I. G., Dzhukha V. M., Ternovskii O. A. Mezhdistsiplinarnye osnovaniya issledovaniya krupnomasshtabnykh ekonomicheskikh sistem na osnove teorii tsenozov: monografiya / pod red. A. N. Kuz'minova. Rostov-na-Donu: Izdatel'sko-poligraficheskii kompleks Rostovskogo gos. ekonomicheskogo un-ta (RINKh), 2018. 238 s.
  8. Nauka. Tekhnologii. Chelovek: materialy "kruglogo stola" // Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. 2015. T. 20. № 2. S. 5-49.
  9. Pavlenko A. N. Martin Khaidegger: sushchnost' sovremennoi tekhniki // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya "Filosofiya". 2003. № 1. S. 65-67.
  10. Popkova N. V. Sotsial'naya priroda tekhniki // Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. 2018. T. 23. № 2. S. 49-60.
  11. Rozin V. M. Ponyatie i sovremennye kontseptsii tekhniki. M.: In-t filosofii RAN, 2006. 255 s.
  12. Slinin Ya. A. Dve antichnye modeli vsego sushchego: Aristotel' i Platon [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/dve-antichnye-modeli-vsego-suschego-aristotel-i-platon (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2020).
  13. Addis W. Free will and determinism in the conception of structures // Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures. 1997. № 38 (2). R. 83-89.
  14. Addis W. Structural engineering: The nature of theory and design. N. Y.: Ellis Horwood, 1990. 258 p.
  15. Alvi I. Engineers need to get real, but can’t: The role of models [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/271367673_Engineers_Need_to_Get_Real_But_Can't_The_Role_of_Models (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2020).
  16. Bergstrom J., Winsen R. van, Henriqson E. On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: A literature review // Reliability Engineering & System Safety. Special Issue on Resilience Engineering. 2015. № 141. R. 131-141.
  17. Billington D. P. The tower and the bridge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983. 328 p.
  18. Elms D. Achieving structural safety: Theoretical considerations // Structural Safety. 1999. № 21. R. 311-333.
  19. Ferguson E. S. Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992. 258 p.
  20. Galambos T. V. Design codes // Engineering safety / ed. by D. Blockley. L.: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1992. R. 47-71.
  21. Goldman S. L. Why we need a philosophy of engineering: A work in progress // Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2004. № 29 (2). R. 163-176.
  22. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. N. Y.: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 2011. 512 r.
  23. Koen B. V. Debunking contemporary myths concerning engineering // Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles, and process / ed. by D. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, D. Goldberg. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. P. 115-137.
  24. Layton E. T. The revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American engineering profession. Cleveland, OH: The Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1971. 210 r.
  25. McCarthy N. Philosophy and engineering // Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2008. № 33 (3). R. 189-201.
  26. Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1959. 513 p.
  27. Schmidt J. A. Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2014. № 20. R. 985-1010.
  28. Simon H. A. The structure of ill-structured problems // Artificial Intelligence. 1973. № 4. R. 181-201.
  29. Taleb N. N. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. N. Y.: Random House, 2007. 220 p.
  30. Vincenti W. G. What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University, 1990. 326 p.
  31. Wiendahl H.-P., Scholtissek P. Management and control of complexity in manufacturing // CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology. 1994. № 43 (2). R. 533-540.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru