Èçäàòåëüñòâî ÃÐÀÌÎÒÀ - ïóáëèêàöèÿ íàó÷íûõ ñòàòåé â ïåðèîäè÷åñêèõ èçäàíèÿõ
Ïåäàãîãèêà. Âîïðîñû òåîðèè è ïðàêòèêè (âõîäèò â ïåðå÷åíü ÂÀÊ)Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè. Âîïðîñû òåîðèè è ïðàêòèêè (âõîäèò â ïåðå÷åíü ÂÀÊ)Ìàíóñêðèïò

Àðõèâ íàó÷íûõ ñòàòåé

ÈÑÒÎ×ÍÈÊ:   Àëüìàíàõ ñîâðåìåííîé íàóêè è îáðàçîâàíèÿ. Òàìáîâ: Ãðàìîòà, 2010. ¹ 12. Ñ. 130-134.
ÐÀÇÄÅË: Ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè
Îïóáëèêîâàòü ñòàòüþ â æóðíàëå | Ïîêàçàòü ñîäåðæàíèå íîìåðà | Ïîêàçàòü âñå ñòàòüè ðàçäåëà | Ïðåäìåòíûé óêàçàòåëü

Ëèöåíçèîííîå ñîãëàøåíèå îá èñïîëüçîâàíèè íàó÷íûõ ìàòåðèàëîâ.

ÐÎËÜ ÏÐÅÄÓÁÅÆÄÅÍÈß Â ÂÎÑÏÐÈßÒÈÈ ÃÐÀÍÈÖ ÝÒÍÈ×ÅÑÊÎÉ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ

Êîòîâà Ìàðèíà Âèêòîðîâíà
Ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò - Âûñøàÿ øêîëà ýêîíîìèêè


Îòêðûòü ïîëíûé òåêñò ñòàòüè â ôîðìàòå PDF. Áåñïëàòíûé ïðîñìîòðùèê PDF-ôàéëîâ ìîæíî ñêà÷àòü çäåñü.

 

Ñïèñîê ëèòåðàòóðû:
  1. Àâêñåíòüåâ Â. À. Ýòíè÷åñêèå êîíôëèêòû: èñòîðèÿ è òèïîëîãèÿ // Ñîöèîëîãè÷åñêèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ. 1996. ¹ 12. Ñ. 43-50.
  2. Áàðò Ô. Ââåäåíèå // Ýòíè÷åñêèå ãðóïïû è ñîöèàëüíûå ãðàíèöû. Ñîöèàëüíàÿ îðãàíèçàöèÿ êóëüòóðíûõ ðàçëè÷èé: ñáîðíèê ñòàòåé / ïîä ðåä. Ô. Áàðòà. Ì., 2006. Ñ. 9-48.
  3. Áîíåð Ã. Óñòàíîâêè // Ââåäåíèå â ñîöèàëüíóþ ïñèõîëîãèþ. Åâðîïåéñêèé ïîäõîä / ïîä ðåä. Ì. Õüþñòîíà, Â. Øòðåáå. Ì., 2004. Ñ. 231-274.
  4. Çäðàâîìûñëîâ À. Ã. Ýòíîïîëèòè÷åñêèå ïðîöåññû è äèíàìèêà íàöèîíàëüíîãî ñàìîñîçíàíèÿ ðîññèÿí // Ñîöèîëîãè÷åñêèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ. 1996. ¹ 12. Ñ. 23-32.
  5. Êîòîâà Ì. Â. Äèôôåðåíöèàöèÿ íåãàòèâíûõ ýòíè÷åñêèõ óñòàíîâîê êàê ôàêòîð ñíèæåíèÿ óðîâíÿ ïðåäóáåæäåííîñòè: äèïëîìíàÿ ðàáîòà. Ì.: ÌÃÓ, 2005.
  6. Êîòîâà Ì. Â. Ýòíè÷åñêîå ïðåäóáåæäåíèå è óñòàíîâêà: ñîîòíîøåíèå ïîíÿòèé // Âåñòíèê Ãîñóäàðñòâåííîãî óíèâåðñèòåòà óïðàâëåíèÿ. 2008. ¹ 8. Ñ. 79-80.
  7. Íàë÷àäæÿí À. À. Ýòíîïñèõîëîãèÿ. ÑÏá., 2004.
  8. Ñåìåíîâ Þ. È. Ôèëîñîôèÿ èñòîðèè. Ì., 2003.
  9. Ñòåôàíåíêî Ò. Ã. Ýòíîïñèõîëîãèÿ. Ì., 2004.
  10. Allport G. W. The nature of prejudice. N.Y., 1958.
  11. Brewer M. B., Hong Y-Y., Li Q. Dynamic entitativity. Perceiving groups as actors // The psychology of group perception: perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism / åd. by V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, O. Corneille. Philadelphia, 2004. P. 25-38.
  12. Brown R. Prejudice. Its social psychology. Malden, 2004.
  13. Crawford M. T., Sherman S. J., Hamilton D. L. Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2002. Vol. 83. No. 5. P. 1076-1094.
  14. Crisp R. J., Hewstone M., Rubin M. Does multiple categorization reduce intergroup bias // Personality and social psychology bulletin. 2001. Vol. 27. No. 5. Ð. 76-89.
  15. Dasgupta N., Banaji M. R., Abelson R. P. Group entitativity and group perception: associations between physical features and psychological judgment // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1999. Vol. 77. No. 5. P. 991-1003.
  16. Dovidio J. F., Glick P., Rudman L. A. Introduction: reflecting on the nature of prejudice: fifty years after Allport // On the nature of prejudice: fifty years after Allport / ed. by J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, L. A. Rudman. Oxford, 2005. P. 1-16.
  17. Stephan W. G., Stephan C. W. Intergroup relations. Madison, 1996.
  18. Stephan W. G., Stephan C. W. Intergroup relations program evaluation // On the nature of prejudice: fifty years after Allport / ed. by J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, L. A. Rudman. Oxford, 2005. P. 431-446.

Îïóáëèêîâàòü ñòàòüþ â æóðíàëå | Ïîêàçàòü ñîäåðæàíèå íîìåðà | Ïîêàçàòü âñå ñòàòüè ðàçäåëà | Ïðåäìåòíûé óêàçàòåëü

© 2006-2022 Èçäàòåëüñòâî ÃÐÀÌÎÒÀ

ðàçðàáîòêà è ñîçäàíèå ñàéòà, ïîèñêîâàÿ îïòèìèçàöèÿ: krav.ru